mcpField
R
refactoring-best-practices

refactoring-best-practices

github.com/luckysDevelopment540 installsUpdated 2w ago
Repository

About refactoring-best-practices

A skill for developers changing existing code safely. It prioritizes preserving behavior, establishing feedback, and making small, reversible changes guided by concrete pain points.

Key features

  1. 01Observe and document current behavior
  2. 02Add feedback with characterization tests
  3. 03Isolate risky dependencies
  4. 04Refactor one responsibility at a time
  5. 05Consult guidance for legacy-code changes

Use cases

  1. 01Start refactoring code without tests
  2. 02Isolate infrastructure behind boundaries
  3. 03Break up large services incrementally
  4. 04Migrate persisted data or error contracts

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/luckys/agent-skills --skill refactoring-best-practices

After installing, type/refactoring-best-practicesin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

references/
characterization-tests.md
code-smells.md
compatibility-and-migration.md
domain-event-migration.md
error-contract-migration.md
fran-iglesias-refactoring-guidance.md
language-examples.md
legacy-code-techniques.md
refactoring-moves.md
safe-change-workflow.md
third-party-notices.md

Details

From the project README

Refactoring Best Practices

Use this skill when the main challenge is changing existing code safely.

Working Style

  1. Protect behavior before improving design.
  2. Prefer small reversible moves over dramatic rewrites.
  3. Add feedback before adding abstraction.
  4. Change one responsibility at a time.
  5. Let the current pain point decide the next move.

Safe Refactoring Workflow

  1. Observe current behavior.

    • Identify outputs, side effects, and error paths.
    • Identify what must not change.
  2. Add feedback.

    • Prefer characterization tests around visible behavior.
    • Add logs or temporary probes only when tests are not enough.
  3. Find a seam.

    • Isolate time, file system, network, framework globals, singletons, and external APIs.
    • Create the narrowest possible boundary around the risky dependency.
  4. Choose the next move.

    • extract method
    • extract class
    • introduce value object
    • introduce first-class collection
    • move method
    • replace conditional with polymorphism
    • separate construction from behavior
    • extract a Domain Event and one secondary subscriber
  5. Re-run feedback after every meaningful step.

High-Value Refactoring Moves

  • Replace a cohesive domain parameter group with a Value Object; use a Parameter Object when the group has no shared domain meaning or invariant.
  • Break large services into role-focused collaborators.
  • Move business rules out of controllers, scripts, and utility classes.
  • Replace type codes and unstable conditionals with explicit roles.
  • Wrap infrastructure behind ports or adapters.
  • Split classes when different method clusters change for different reasons.

Red Flags

  • Big-bang rewrites.
  • New abstractions without a protected behavior baseline.
  • Splitting code into tiny classes without a clearer model.
  • Introducing inheritance only to make tests easier.
  • Refactoring based on aesthetics alone while ignoring risk.

Decision Rules

Refactor now when
  • the same knowledge is duplicated in multiple places
  • the code is blocking a real change
  • the next feature would deepen coupling or duplication
  • the current structure makes defects likely
Wait when
  • there is no feedback loop yet
  • the pain is hypothetical
  • the abstraction is not yet stable enough to deserve a new type
  • the change is broad but the understanding is still weak

References

  • Read references/compatibility-and-migration.md when changing callers, deleting legacy paths, or migrating persisted representations.

  • Read references/safe-change-workflow.md for seam-based refactoring guidance, sensing and separation, and the legacy code change algorithm.

  • Read references/refactoring-moves.md for tactical moves, including the incremental Value Object migration sequence, and when to use them.

  • Read references/code-smells.md when recognizing a problem, using temporal co-change as design evidence, and choosing the right move.

  • Read references/legacy-code-techniques.md for Sprout, Wrap, Extract and Override, and other techniques for working without tests.

  • Read references/characterization-tests.md for how to write tests before refactoring untested code.

  • Read references/domain-event-migration.md for incrementally moving legacy side effects to events/subscribers, preserving failure semantics, durable handoff, and CDC as a migration bridge.

  • Read references/error-contract-migration.md for safely replacing nulls, strings, and generic exceptions while preserving failure timing, diagnostics, redaction, and public contracts.

  • Read references/fran-iglesias-refactoring-guidance.md for practical refactoring heuristics distilled from Fran Iglesias.

  • Read references/language-examples.md for before/after style examples in multiple languages.

Related Skills

  • Use oop-best-practices for everyday new code decisions.
  • Use design-patterns-best-practices when the main issue is choosing an object collaboration pattern.
  • Use ddd-best-practices when moving invariants, splitting a God Aggregate, introducing a root, changing a consistency boundary, or shaping a domain Repository extracted from legacy persistence.
  • Use data-migration-best-practices for moving or backfilling persisted data; this skill owns only the safe code seams and compatibility paths around that operational migration.

Source Influences

This skill is synthesized from ideas emphasized in:

Comments

Markdown supported