mcpField
R
requirements-analysis-plus

requirements-analysis-plus

github.com/naodengDevelopment285106 installsUpdated 1d ago
Repository

About requirements-analysis-plus

requirements-analysis-plus is a skill for analyzing requirements across multiple documents, with emphasis on risk-based prioritization, conflicts, and follow-up questions. It guides agents to produce actionable drafts while marking assumptions and gaps.

Key features

  1. 01Cross-document requirement analysis
  2. 02Risk and business-impact prioritization
  3. 03Conflict and inconsistency checks
  4. 04Assumptions and gaps marked
  5. 05Optional role-report inputs

Use cases

  1. 01Analyzing requirements from several source documents
  2. 02Prioritizing high-impact requirements and risks
  3. 03Drafting requirements when information is incomplete

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/naodeng/awesome-qa-skills --skill requirements-analysis-plus

After installing, type/requirements-analysis-plusin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

README.md
agents/
openai.yaml
evals/
eval.yaml
evals/cases/
basic-success.yaml
edge-incomplete-input.yaml
edge-risk-priority.yaml
edge-role-artifact-input.yaml
review-repair-regression.yaml
evals/graders/
review-repair-regression.py
examples/
requirements-sample.analysis.md
requirements-sample.json
requirements-sample.md
output-templates/
template-markdown.md
prompts/
requirements-analysis-plus.md
references/
script-contract.md
references/local/
requirements-analysis_EN.md
scripts/
common_parser.py
evidence_scaffold.py
parse_excel.py
parse_html.py
parse_json.py
parse_markdown.py
parse_word.py
run_analysis.py
xlsx_reader.py

Details

From the project README

requirements-analysis-plus (EN)

Chinese version: See the corresponding Chinese skill.

When to Use

  • Need deeper requirement analysis across multiple source documents.
  • Need stronger prioritization, conflict checks, and follow-up questions than the base version.

Script capability boundary

Optional scripts/run_*.py prepare parsed evidence or source candidates with NOT_ASSESSED. They do not call a model, execute the main prompt, or produce semantic conclusions, risk priorities, complete cases, or approval. An agent performs the main prompt. Read references/script-contract.md before running helpers.

Workflow

  1. Read and follow the main prompt listed under Progressive disclosure (coverage, structure, quality bar).
  2. Direct requirement materials remain sufficient for standalone use. If the user supplies role reports with a declared source_role, treat them as optional composition inputs and never require installing a role Skill.
  3. Add only project context that changes the result: scope, environment, constraints, risks, dependencies, expected deliverable.
  4. If input is incomplete, return a usable first draft and explicitly mark assumptions and gaps.
  5. Default to Markdown; switch formats only when the user asks.

Core Constraints

  • Prioritize by risk / business impact — do not treat everything equally.
  • Separate confirmed facts from current assumptions.
  • Do not invent endpoints, fields, environments, or root causes the user did not provide.
  • When using a fact, view, risk, or question from a role report, preserve its source-role attribution item by item; never present a role view as a primary requirement fact or anonymous consensus.
  • Consume only report content supplied by the user; do not read, link to, or depend on another role Skill's internal files.
  • Keep output executable: concrete scenarios, clear priority, clear next steps.

Progressive Disclosure

  • Before producing output, read and follow prompts/requirements-analysis-plus.md (minimum coverage, output structure, quality bar).
  • When a ready-made template fits: use matching files under output-templates/.
  • When the user wants examples or alignment with existing assets: read relevant examples/.
  • For deep framework/troubleshoot/schema notes: read only the relevant file(s) under references/, do not load the whole directory.
  • For format conversion or helper checks: prefer existing scripts/ over reinventing.
  • For evaluating/regressing this skill: use evals/ with skill-up.

Pre-delivery Checklist

  • Followed the main prompt's output structure
  • Minimum coverage focus: source alignment, scope summary, conflicts and inconsistencies, missing rules, testability risks, dependency impacts, business impact, priority by risk, ... (details in main prompt)
  • Covered the minimum checklist, or explained omissions
  • High-risk items have explicit priority
  • Did not invent details the user did not provide
  • Assumptions and gaps are marked
  • Findings, risks, and open questions that use role reports retain their source roles
  • Optional role reports did not become prerequisites and no role Skill internal file was linked

Common Pitfalls

  • Do not pretend completeness when scope/context is missing.
  • Do not treat every item as equally important.
  • Do not skip assumptions and information gaps.
  • Do not dump generic theory unrelated to the current toolchain.

Comments

Markdown supported