mcpField
R
review

review

github.com/owl-listenerTesting & quality10873 installsUpdated 20w ago
Repository

About review

A skill for conducting a structured cognitive accessibility review of an interface, flow, or content. It combines six assessment areas and produces findings with severity, affected groups, and prioritized recommendations.

Key features

  1. 01Six-phase cognitive accessibility review
  2. 02Assessment of cognitive load dimensions
  3. 03Review of language and wayfinding
  4. 04Checks for errors, focus, and memory load
  5. 05Screen-by-screen findings and recommendations

Use cases

  1. 01Reviewing a multi-step interface flow
  2. 02Finding confusing or cognitively demanding screens
  3. 03Prioritizing fixes by impact and effort

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review

After installing, type/reviewin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

Cognitive Accessibility Review

Run a comprehensive cognitive accessibility review. This command chains six skills into a structured assessment.

Process

Phase 1: Context

Identify the interface, flow, or content to review. Establish:

  • Who uses this and what cognitive state they're likely in
  • What the stakes are (low, medium, high)
  • What cognitive demands the task makes
Phase 2: Cognitive Load Assessment

Using the cognitive-load-assessment skill, evaluate each screen or step across all six dimensions: decisions, memory, new concepts, steps, reading complexity, and visual complexity.

Phase 3: Language Review

Using the plain-language-design skill, review all user-facing text for readability, jargon, ambiguity, and action clarity.

Phase 4: Wayfinding Check

Using the wayfinding-navigation skill, verify that users always know where they are, where they can go, and how to get back.

Phase 5: Error & Focus Review

Using error-prevention-recovery and focus-attention-design skills, review error handling patterns and identify distractions or attention hazards.

Phase 6: Memory Load Check

Using the memory-load-reduction skill, identify any place where users must remember information across screens, steps, or sessions.

Output

Present findings as a structured report:

  1. Executive summary — overall cognitive accessibility rating and top 3 issues
  2. Screen-by-screen findings — table of issues by screen/step with severity (critical / major / minor)
  3. Prioritised recommendations — specific fixes ranked by impact and effort
  4. Population impact — which user groups are most affected by each issue

Severity definitions:

  • Critical — prevents task completion for users with cognitive disabilities
  • Major — causes significant difficulty or confusion
  • Minor — creates friction but doesn't block completion

Comments

Markdown supported