S
sales-qualification-discovery-review
About sales-qualification-discovery-review
A sales qualification and discovery skill for turning opportunity questions into structured plans with evidence, owners, decision gates, and follow-up paths. It emphasizes evidence-based qualification and clear handling of risks and disqualifiers.
Key features
- 01Opportunity fit classification
- 02Evidence-based qualification criteria
- 03Discovery questions and risk flags
- 04Mutual action plans and owner handoffs
- 05CRM fields and exit criteria
Use cases
- 01Assessing fit and readiness for a sales opportunity
- 02Planning discovery and buyer decision steps
- 03Identifying stalled deals and recovery actions
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
$
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ sylphxai/ skills --skill sales-qualification-discovery-reviewAfter installing, type/sales-qualification-discovery-reviewin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Bundled filesagents/openai.yamlreferences/sales-qualification-discovery-patterns.md
Details
From the project READMESales Qualification Discovery Review
Use this skill to convert sales qualification, discovery, opportunity fit, decision-process, and mutual action plan questions into a concrete artifact with owners, gates, metrics, and recovery paths.
Workflow
- Identify segment, ICP, source, buyer role, current trigger, business pain, current workaround, buying committee, timeline, budget, technical constraints, and next decision.
- Read
references/sales-qualification-discovery-patterns.md. - Classify the account as no-fit, nurture, discovery-needed, qualified opportunity, technical validation, procurement, stalled, or disqualified.
- Define discovery questions, qualification evidence, red/yellow/green flags, mutual action plan, owner handoffs, CRM fields, and exit criteria.
- Produce qualification plan, state machine, decision table, event schema, discovery checklist, and follow-up plan.
When not to use
- Do not use for generic advice the base model already handles without this skill's specific artifact contract.
Guardrails
- Do not qualify on enthusiasm alone; require problem, impact, decision path, and next commitment evidence.
- Do not force enterprise discovery on low-value self-serve users when product-led routing is better.
- Do not hide no-fit, missing authority, fake urgency, weak pain, or procurement blockers to protect pipeline optics.
- Do not promise product, security, legal, pricing, or implementation commitments outside approved owners.
Output format
Discovery context:
Audience / source of truth / risk boundary:
Qualification plan:
| Area | Decision | Evidence | Risk | Owner |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
Discovery questions, flags, and next commitments:
- <trigger> -> <policy, metric, edge case, support note>
Comments
Markdown supported