mcpField
S
story-review

story-review

github.com/haowjyCreative & media552681 installsUpdated 2d ago
Repository

About story-review

A writing skill for diagnosing existing prose without rewriting it. It guides editorial, developmental, line, copy, and proofreading reviews, with separate resources for craft critique and interpreting reader-simulation data.

Key features

  1. 01Five levels of editorial review
  2. 02Separate craft-critique resources
  3. 03Reader-simulation signal guidance
  4. 04Review methods and checklists

Use cases

  1. 01Choose revision priorities for a draft
  2. 02Assess structure, pacing, and character arcs
  3. 03Check prose voice, clarity, and correctness

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/haowjy/creative-writing-skills --skill story-review

After installing, type/story-reviewin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

resources/
copyedit.md
developmental-edit.md
editorial-review.md
line-edit.md
proofreading.md
prose-critique.md
reader-sim-signal.md
resources/prose-critique/
analyze.py
antipatterns.md
baseline.md
character.md
continuity.md
prose.md
structure.md
voice.md

Details

From the project README

Story Review

Analytical review of existing prose. This skill is for diagnosis, not rewriting. Keep /reader-sim separate when the task needs a felt first-time reader experience rather than analytical critique.

Choose the review level before reading. Start big before small unless the caller explicitly asks for a late-stage pass. The edit levels move from structural to surface, and each assumes the levels above it are stable:

  • Editorial review — holistic third-party book-editor pass. What kind of revision does this draft need, and in what order?
  • Developmental edit — structure, promise, causality, pacing, character arc. Is the draft the right shape?
  • Line edit — voice, rhythm, clarity, texture. Does the prose move well?
  • Copyedit — grammar, usage, punctuation, consistency. Is it correct?
  • Proofreading — final surface pass. What slipped through?

Each level has a dedicated resource with method and checklist:

  • resources/editorial-review.md
  • resources/developmental-edit.md
  • resources/line-edit.md
  • resources/copyedit.md
  • resources/proofreading.md

For adversarial craft critique (as opposed to editorial review), load:

  • resources/prose-critique.md — methodology and focus-area routing.
  • resources/prose-critique/ — deep resources per focus area (structure, character, voice, prose, continuity).

When review incorporates reader-sim data:

  • resources/reader-sim-signal.md — how to interpret and synthesize reader-sim output alongside analytical critique.

Comments

Markdown supported