mcpField

superpowers

github.com/founderjourneyAgent workflows135 installs
Repository

About superpowers

Superpowers is a structured software development framework for coding agents, designed to replace immediate coding with a cycle of clarification, design, planning, implementation, and review. It emphasizes small tasks, test-first work, and verification throughout development.

Key features

  1. 01Clarifies requirements and explores the codebase
  2. 02Plans work as small, isolated tasks
  3. 03Uses the RED–GREEN–REFACTOR test cycle
  4. 04Reviews specifications, code quality, and integration
  5. 05Includes debugging and collaboration practices

Use cases

  1. 01Developing complex features across multiple files
  2. 02Refactoring code in small verifiable steps
  3. 03Applying test-driven development
  4. 04Debugging issues and preventing regressions

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/founderjourney/claude-skills --skill superpowers

After installing, type/superpowersin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

Superpowers

A structured software development framework that transforms how coding agents approach development—preventing the "write code immediately" antipattern.

When to Use This Skill

  • Complex feature development
  • Multi-file refactoring
  • Test-driven development
  • Code review processes
  • Systematic debugging
  • Team collaboration with AI

The Philosophy

Traditional AI coding:

User: "Add auth to the app"
AI: *immediately writes 500 lines of code*

Superpowers approach:

User: "Add auth to the app"
AI: "Let me understand requirements first..."
   → Questions → Design → Plan → Execute → Review

Core Workflow

Phase 1: Understanding
1. Ask clarifying questions
2. Explore existing codebase
3. Understand constraints
4. Validate assumptions
Phase 2: Design
1. Create isolated workspace (git branch)
2. Break work into 2-5 minute tasks
3. Define exact specifications
4. Get approval before coding
Phase 3: Execution
1. RED: Write failing test
2. GREEN: Minimum code to pass
3. REFACTOR: Clean up
4. Review before next task
Phase 4: Review
1. Specification compliance check
2. Code quality review
3. Integration verification
4. Branch completion decision

Key Principles

1. Design Before Code

Never write code without understanding:

  • What problem are we solving?
  • What are the constraints?
  • How does it fit existing code?
  • What are the edge cases?
2. Small, Focused Tasks

Each task should be:

  • Completable in 2-5 minutes
  • Single responsibility
  • Independently testable
  • Clear success criteria
3. Test-First Development
RED → GREEN → REFACTOR
  • Write test first
  • Minimum code to pass
  • Clean up afterward
  • Never skip this cycle
4. Systematic, Not Ad-hoc
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Systematic          vs.    Ad-hoc  │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Plan then execute   │ Jump in      │
│ Verify with tests   │ Hope it works│
│ Review each step    │ Review at end│
│ Evidence-based      │ Assumption   │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
5. Evidence Over Assumption
  • Don't assume code works—verify
  • Don't assume understanding—validate
  • Don't assume completion—prove

Skills Library

Testing
  • Unit test patterns
  • Integration testing
  • Test coverage analysis
  • Mocking strategies
Debugging
1. Reproduce the issue
2. Isolate the cause
3. Root cause analysis
4. Verify the fix
5. Prevent regression
Collaboration
  • Brainstorming: Explore options
  • Planning: Structure approach
  • Parallel execution: Multiple agents
  • Review: Quality gates
Meta-Skills
  • Extending the framework
  • Custom skill creation
  • Workflow optimization

How to Use

Starting a Feature
I want to add user authentication.

Help me think through:
1. What auth mechanism?
2. Session vs JWT?
3. Where to store credentials?
4. What existing code to modify?
During Development
I'm implementing the login endpoint.

Current state:
- User model exists
- Password hashing ready

Next: Create POST /login endpoint

Tests first, then implementation.
Code Review
Review my changes:
[paste diff]

Check against:
- Original spec
- Test coverage
- Code quality
- Security concerns

Example: Adding a Feature

1. Discovery
User: "Add forgot password feature"

Agent: "Before we start, let me understand:
1. How should the reset link be delivered? (email?)
2. What's the token expiry? (1 hour?)
3. Should we rate limit attempts?
4. Any existing email infrastructure?"
2. Planning
Tasks:
1. Create password_reset_tokens table
2. Add POST /forgot-password endpoint
3. Add POST /reset-password endpoint
4. Create email template
5. Add rate limiting middleware
3. Execution (Task 1)
## Task: Create password_reset_tokens table

### Test (RED)
- Test migration creates table
- Test table has correct columns

### Implementation (GREEN)
- Create migration file
- Define schema

### Verify
- Run migration
- Check table exists
4. Review
## Task 1 Complete

✓ Migration runs successfully
✓ Table has: id, user_id, token, expires_at
✓ Foreign key constraint works

Ready for Task 2?

Best Practices

  1. Don't Rush: Speed comes from fewer mistakes
  2. Ask Questions: Clarify before implementing
  3. Small Steps: Easier to verify and debug
  4. Test Everything: Trust comes from evidence
  5. Review Often: Catch issues early

Integration

Available for:

  • Claude Code: Via marketplace
  • Codex: Plugin installation
  • OpenCode: Direct integration

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • Writing code without understanding requirements
  • Skipping tests "to save time"
  • Large PRs with multiple concerns
  • Assuming code works without verification
  • Declaring done without evidence

Comments

Markdown supported