mcpField
S
system-design-generator

system-design-generator

github.com/patricio0312revDevelopment63271 installsUpdated 41w ago
Repository

About system-design-generator

A skill for turning requirements into system architecture plans for development teams. Its templates cover components, data flows, API contracts, scaling, failure modes, and security.

Key features

  1. 01Capture functional and non-functional requirements
  2. 02Diagram high-level architecture and components
  3. 03Define data models and API contracts
  4. 04Consider scaling, failure modes, and costs
  5. 05List security and monitoring concerns

Use cases

  1. 01Draft a system design document for a new feature
  2. 02Plan components and data flow for upload and asynchronous processing
  3. 03Record scaling strategies and potential failures before implementation

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/patricio0312rev/skills --skill system-design-generator

After installing, type/system-design-generatorin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

System Design Generator

Create comprehensive system architecture plans from requirements.

System Design Document Template

# System Design: [Feature/Product Name]

## Overview

Brief description of what we're building and why.

## Requirements

### Functional

- User can upload videos (max 1GB)
- System processes video within 5 minutes
- User receives notification when complete

### Non-Functional

- Handle 1000 uploads/day
- 99.9% uptime
- Process videos in <5 minutes (p95)
- Cost: <$0.50 per video

## High-Level Architecture

┌─────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │ Client │─────▶│ API │─────▶│ Upload │ │ │ │ Gateway │ │ Service │ └─────────┘ └──────────┘ └─────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌─────────────┐ │ Storage │ │ (S3) │ └─────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌─────────────┐ │ Processing │◀─┐ │ Queue │ │ └─────────────┘ │ │ │ ▼ │ ┌─────────────┐ │ │ Processor │─┘ │ Workers │ └─────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌─────────────┐ │Notification │ │ Service │ └─────────────┘


## Components

### 1. API Gateway
**Responsibilities:**
- Authentication
- Rate limiting
- Request routing

**Technology:** Kong/AWS API Gateway
**Scaling:** Auto-scale based on requests/sec

### 2. Upload Service
**Responsibilities:**
- Generate pre-signed S3 URLs
- Validate file metadata
- Enqueue processing jobs

**API:**

POST /uploads Request: { filename, size, content_type } Response: { upload_url, upload_id }


**Technology:** Node.js + Express
**Scaling:** Horizontal (stateless)

### 3. Storage (S3)
**Responsibilities:**
- Store raw videos
- Store processed outputs
- Serve content via CDN

**Structure:**

/uploads/{user_id}/{upload_id}/original.mp4 /processed/{user_id}/{upload_id}/output.mp4


### 4. Processing Queue
**Responsibilities:**
- Buffer processing jobs
- Ensure at-least-once delivery
- DLQ for failed jobs

**Technology:** AWS SQS
**Configuration:**
- Visibility timeout: 15 minutes
- DLQ after 3 retries

### 5. Processor Workers
**Responsibilities:**
- Transcode videos
- Generate thumbnails
- Update database

**Technology:** Python + FFmpeg
**Scaling:** Auto-scale on queue depth

## Data Flow

### Upload Flow
1. Client requests upload URL from Upload Service
2. Upload Service generates pre-signed S3 URL
3. Client uploads directly to S3
4. Client notifies Upload Service of completion
5. Upload Service enqueues processing job
6. Returns upload_id to client

### Processing Flow
1. Worker polls queue for jobs
2. Downloads video from S3
3. Processes video (transcode, thumbnail)
4. Uploads results to S3
5. Updates database status
6. Sends notification
7. Deletes message from queue

## Data Model

```typescript
interface Upload {
  id: string;
  user_id: string;
  filename: string;
  size: number;
  status: 'pending' | 'processing' | 'complete' | 'failed';
  original_url: string;
  processed_url?: string;
  created_at: Date;
  processed_at?: Date;
}

interface ProcessingJob {
  upload_id: string;
  attempts: number;
  error?: string;
}

API Contract

Upload Endpoints
POST   /uploads           - Request upload URL
GET    /uploads/:id       - Get upload status
DELETE /uploads/:id       - Cancel upload
GET    /uploads           - List user uploads
Webhooks
POST {webhook_url}
{
  "event": "upload.completed",
  "upload_id": "...",
  "status": "complete",
  "processed_url": "..."
}

Scaling Considerations

Current Capacity
  • 1000 uploads/day = ~1 per minute
  • Single worker can process 1 video every 5 minutes
  • Need 5 workers for current load
10x Scale (10,000/day)
  • ~10 uploads per minute
  • Need 50 workers
  • Use spot instances for cost savings
  • Add Redis cache for status checks
100x Scale (100,000/day)
  • ~100 uploads per minute
  • Partition by region
  • Use Kafka instead of SQS
  • Database sharding by user_id

Failure Modes

S3 Unavailable
  • Impact: Uploads fail
  • Mitigation: Multi-region S3 replication
Queue Backed Up
  • Impact: Processing delays
  • Mitigation: Auto-scale workers faster
Worker Crash During Processing
  • Impact: Job retried
  • Mitigation: Idempotent processing

Cost Estimate

Monthly (1000 uploads/day):

  • S3 Storage: $50
  • S3 Transfer: $100
  • SQS: $10
  • Workers (EC2): $300
  • Database: $100 Total: ~$560/month

Security

  • Pre-signed URLs expire in 1 hour
  • Videos in private S3 buckets
  • CloudFront signed URLs for delivery
  • Rate limiting per user

Monitoring

Metrics:

  • Upload success rate
  • Processing time (p50, p95, p99)
  • Queue depth
  • Worker CPU/memory
  • Error rate by type

Alerts:

  • Queue depth >1000
  • Processing time p95 >10 minutes
  • Error rate >5%

Open Questions

  • Video retention policy? (30 days? 1 year?)
  • Maximum video duration? (affects processing time)
  • Regional data residency requirements?

## Component Template

```markdown
### Component Name

**Responsibilities:**
- Primary responsibility
- Secondary responsibility

**Technology Stack:**
- Language: [Python/Node/Go]
- Framework: [Express/FastAPI/Gin]
- Database: [PostgreSQL/MongoDB]

**API/Interface:**
```typescript
interface ComponentAPI {
  method(params): ReturnType;
}

Scaling Strategy:

  • Horizontal: Stateless, load balanced
  • Vertical: Cache layer, connection pooling

Dependencies:

  • Service A (for X)
  • Database B (for persistence)

Failure Handling:

  • Retry with exponential backoff
  • Circuit breaker for downstream services
  • Fallback to cached data

## Best Practices

1. **Start with requirements**: Functional + non-functional
2. **Draw diagrams first**: Visual clarity
3. **Define boundaries**: What's in scope vs out
4. **Document tradeoffs**: Every choice has costs
5. **Plan for failure**: What breaks and how to handle
6. **Consider scale**: Current, 10x, 100x
7. **Estimate costs**: Build vs buy decisions
8. **Leave open questions**: Don't pretend to know everything

## Output Checklist

- [ ] Requirements documented (functional + non-functional)
- [ ] High-level architecture diagram
- [ ] Component breakdown (3-7 components)
- [ ] Data flow documented
- [ ] Data model defined
- [ ] API contracts specified
- [ ] Scaling considerations (1x, 10x, 100x)
- [ ] Failure modes identified
- [ ] Cost estimate provided
- [ ] Security considerations
- [ ] Monitoring plan

Comments

Markdown supported