About taste-vs-trends
taste-vs-trends is a design skill for judging whether a decision rests on lasting principles or short-lived trends. It uses tests of longevity, rationale, and transferability, and encourages alternatives grounded in user needs without dismissing trends outright.
Key features
- 01Test design decisions over time
- 02Examine the reasoning behind choices
- 03Check whether principles transfer
- 04Distinguish trends from principles
- 05Suggest user-focused alternatives
Use cases
- 01Review a proposed visual trend
- 02Evaluate whether a choice serves users
- 03Find alternatives to trend-led decisions
- 04Assess whether a design principle generalizes
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
$
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ dragoon0x/ taste-skills --skill taste-vs-trendsAfter installing, type/taste-vs-trendsin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Details
From the project READMETaste vs. Trends
Separate decisions that last from decisions that expire.
How to use
/taste-vs-trendsApply taste-vs-trend analysis to any design decision in this conversation.
Constraints
The Three Tests
- Time test: Will this decision still make sense in 2 years? If not, it's a trend.
- Reasoning test: Does the "why" bottom out at "everyone's doing it" (trend) or "it serves the user this way" (taste)?
- Transfer test: Does the principle work across domains, or only in this medium? Principles transfer. Trends don't.
Evaluation Rules
- MUST identify whether a design decision is trend-driven or principle-driven
- MUST challenge "modern" as a design goal. Ask: modern for whom? Modern compared to what?
- SHOULD suggest principle-based alternatives when trend-following is identified
- NEVER dismiss trends entirely. They carry information about user expectations. Use them as inputs, not instructions.
Questions to Ask
- Does this trend solve a real problem for this specific context?
- What would I choose if nobody would ever see my portfolio post?
- Am I choosing this because it's right or because it's safe?
Anti-Patterns
- Calling everything trendy to seem sophisticated (some trends reflect genuine improvements)
- Rejecting contemporary approaches just to be contrarian
- Equating timelessness with conservatism (bold choices can age well too)
Comments
Markdown supported