mcpField
T
teaching-lesson-plan

teaching-lesson-plan

github.com/mohitagw15856Productivity1.5k167 installsUpdated 5d ago
Repository

About teaching-lesson-plan

teaching-lesson-plan is an Agent Skill that creates structured lesson plans for educators and trainers across subjects, audiences, and settings. It includes objectives, timed activities, assessment, differentiation, and quality checks, and marks assumptions when input details are missing.

Key features

  1. 01Structured lesson plan output
  2. 02Learning objectives and key vocabulary
  3. 03Timed activities and materials
  4. 04Formative assessment and exit ticket
  5. 05Differentiation and misconception checks
  6. 06Assumption handling for missing details

Use cases

  1. 01Plan a school lesson for a topic
  2. 02Design corporate training sessions
  3. 03Create workshops for varied audiences

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill teaching-lesson-plan

After installing, type/teaching-lesson-planin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

Teaching Lesson Plan Skill

Produces a complete, structured lesson plan for any subject, age group, or setting — from a one-hour corporate training to a full school lesson. Built around clear learning objectives, varied activities, and formative assessment.

Required Inputs

Work from what is given. If any of these is missing, still produce the complete output: fill each gap with a reasonable assumption marked (assumed, confirm) and list those assumptions at the end. Ask a question first only when the core subject itself is missing (there is nothing to write about).

  • Subject or topic
  • Audience (age group, experience level, group size)
  • Session length (30 / 45 / 60 / 90 / 120 minutes)
  • Setting (classroom / workshop / online / corporate training / one-to-one)
  • Learning goal (what should participants know or be able to do by the end?)
  • Prior knowledge (what can you assume they already know?)

Output Structure


Lesson Plan: [Topic]

Subject: [Subject] | Audience: [Description] | Duration: [X minutes] Setting: [Setting] | Group size: [N]


Learning Objectives

By the end of this session, participants will be able to:

  1. [Objective 1 — use Bloom's taxonomy verbs: recall, explain, apply, analyse, evaluate, create]
  2. [Objective 2]
  3. [Objective 3 — maximum 3–4 objectives per session]

Key vocabulary: [3–5 terms participants will need to know]


Materials and Preparation

  • [Resource 1 — slides, handout, equipment]
  • [Resource 2]
  • Room setup: [configuration — rows / circles / tables / breakout spaces]

Lesson Structure

TimePhaseActivityFormat
[00:00]Hook / Opener[How you grab attention and establish relevance][Whole group / Individual / Pairs]
[00:05]Prior knowledge[How you connect to what they already know][Discussion / Quiz / Think-pair-share]
[00:15]Instruction[Direct teaching of new content][Explanation / Demo / Video]
[00:30]Guided practice[Supported practice with feedback][Worked examples / Group task]
[00:50]Independent practice[Students apply learning independently][Task / Problem / Discussion]
[01:05]Check for understanding[Formative assessment][Exit ticket / Quiz / Q&A]
[01:15]Closure[Summarise, connect to next session][Whole group]

Key Explanations and Worked Examples

[Concept 1]

[Clear explanation + one concrete worked example. Explain the concept the way a good teacher would — no jargon without definition, one idea at a time.]

[Concept 2]

[Explanation + example]


Differentiation

For those who need more support:

  • [Scaffold: e.g. sentence starters, worked examples, vocabulary cards]
  • [Modified task or reduced scope]

For those ready for a challenge:

  • [Extension: e.g. apply to a new context, evaluate, create something]

Formative Assessment (Check for Understanding)

During session:

  • [Method 1: e.g. Cold calling with no-stakes approach, thumbs up/down, mini whiteboards]
  • [Method 2: e.g. Think-pair-share before moving on]

Exit ticket (last 5 minutes): [One specific question that directly tests the learning objective — not "what did you enjoy?" but "solve this problem" or "explain this concept in your own words"]


Common Misconceptions to Address

MisconceptionCorrect understandingHow to address it
[What learners often get wrong][The correct version][Specific activity or explanation]

Quality Checks

  • Learning objectives use action verbs (not "understand" or "know")
  • Session has a clear hook that establishes relevance
  • Activities are varied (not all listening)
  • Formative assessment checks the actual learning objective
  • Differentiation is specified for both support and extension
  • Timing adds up to session length

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not design a lesson plan without explicitly stating the learning objectives — activities must trace back to outcomes
  • Do not allocate timing that does not add up to the total session length — the plan must be time-feasible
  • Do not create activities with no assessment component — learning must be measurable, not just delivered
  • Do not ignore differentiation — a plan with no accommodation for different learning levels or abilities is incomplete
  • Do not front-load all content delivery without interactive breaks — passive listening degrades retention after 15–20 minutes

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Write a lesson plan on [topic] for [audience]"
  • "Design a 60-minute session on [subject]"
  • "Create a training module on [skill]"
  • "Plan a workshop on [topic] for [group]"

Comments

Markdown supported