mcpField
T
test-quality-analysis

test-quality-analysis

github.com/secondskyTesting & quality240455 installsUpdated 5w ago
Repository

About test-quality-analysis

A testing-quality analysis skill for developers reviewing and improving test suites. It explains how to identify test smells and anti-patterns, with guidance on reliability, assertions, mocks, coverage, and maintainability.

Key features

  1. 01Detect overmocking and test smells
  2. 02Identify flaky and fragile tests
  3. 03Improve assertion specificity
  4. 04Review coverage and critical paths
  5. 05Apply mock and unit-test guidelines
  6. 06Use code-review checklists

Use cases

  1. 01Review a test suite for overmocking
  2. 02Investigate tests that fail intermittently
  3. 03Strengthen assertions and error-path coverage
  4. 04Assess test quality during code review

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/secondsky/claude-skills --skill test-quality-analysis

After installing, type/test-quality-analysisin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

Test Quality Analysis

Expert knowledge for analyzing and improving test quality - detecting test smells, overmocking, insufficient coverage, and testing anti-patterns.

Core Dimensions

  • Correctness: Tests verify the right behavior
  • Reliability: Tests are deterministic, not flaky
  • Maintainability: Tests are easy to understand
  • Performance: Tests run quickly
  • Coverage: Tests cover critical code paths
  • Isolation: Tests don't depend on external state

Test Smells

Overmocking

Problem: Mocking too many dependencies makes tests fragile.

// ❌ BAD: Overmocked
test('calculate total', () => {
  const mockAdd = vi.fn(() => 10)
  const mockMultiply = vi.fn(() => 20)
  // Testing implementation, not behavior
})

// ✅ GOOD: Mock only external dependencies
test('calculate order total', () => {
  const mockPricingAPI = vi.fn(() => ({ tax: 0.1 }))
  const total = calculateTotal(order, mockPricingAPI)
  expect(total).toBe(38)
})

Detection: More than 3-4 mocks, mocking pure functions, complex mock setup.

Fix: Mock only I/O boundaries (APIs, databases, filesystem).

Fragile Tests

Problem: Tests break with unrelated code changes.

// ❌ BAD: Tests implementation details
await page.locator('.form-container > div:nth-child(2) > button').click()

// ✅ GOOD: Semantic selector
await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Submit' }).click()
Flaky Tests

Problem: Tests pass or fail non-deterministically.

// ❌ BAD: Race condition
test('loads data', async () => {
  fetchData()
  await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
  expect(data).toBeDefined()
})

// ✅ GOOD: Proper async handling
test('loads data', async () => {
  const data = await fetchData()
  expect(data).toBeDefined()
})
Poor Assertions
// ❌ BAD: Weak assertion
test('returns users', async () => {
  const users = await getUsers()
  expect(users).toBeDefined() // Too vague!
})

// ✅ GOOD: Strong, specific assertions
test('creates user with correct attributes', async () => {
  const user = await createUser({ name: 'John' })
  expect(user).toMatchObject({
    id: expect.any(Number),
    name: 'John',
  })
})

Analysis Tools

# Vitest coverage (prefer bun)
bun test --coverage
open coverage/index.html

# Check thresholds
bun test --coverage --coverage.thresholds.lines=80

# pytest-cov (Python)
uv run pytest --cov --cov-report=html
open htmlcov/index.html

Best Practices Checklist

Unit Test Quality (FIRST)
  • Fast: Tests run in milliseconds
  • Isolated: No dependencies between tests
  • Repeatable: Same results every time
  • Self-validating: Clear pass/fail
  • Timely: Written alongside code
Mock Guidelines
  • Mock only external dependencies
  • Don't mock business logic or pure functions
  • Use real implementations when possible
  • Limit to 3-4 mocks per test maximum
Coverage Goals
  • 80%+ line coverage for business logic
  • 100% for critical paths (auth, payment)
  • All error paths tested
  • Boundary conditions tested
Test Structure (AAA Pattern)
test('user registration', async () => {
  // Arrange
  const userData = { email: '[email protected]' }

  // Act
  const user = await registerUser(userData)

  // Assert
  expect(user.email).toBe('[email protected]')
})

Code Review Checklist

  • Tests verify behavior, not implementation
  • Assertions are specific and meaningful
  • No flaky tests (timing, ordering issues)
  • Proper async/await usage
  • Test names clearly describe behavior
  • Minimal code duplication
  • Critical paths have tests
  • Both happy path and error cases covered

Common Anti-Patterns

Testing Implementation Details
// ❌ BAD
const spy = vi.spyOn(Math, 'sqrt')
calculateDistance()
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalled() // Testing how, not what

// ✅ GOOD
const distance = calculateDistance({ x: 0, y: 0 }, { x: 3, y: 4 })
expect(distance).toBe(5) // Testing output
Mocking Too Much
// ❌ BAD
const mockAdd = vi.fn((a, b) => a + b)

// ✅ GOOD: Use real implementations
import { add } from './utils'
// Only mock external services
const mockPaymentGateway = vi.fn()

See Also

  • vitest-testing - TypeScript/JavaScript testing
  • playwright-testing - E2E testing
  • mutation-testing - Validate test effectiveness

Comments

Markdown supported