mcpField
T
tool-positioning-for-repositories

tool-positioning-for-repositories

github.com/arthurzakirovMarketing & growth0163 installsUpdated 4w ago
Repository

About tool-positioning-for-repositories

A skill for rewriting repository names, descriptions, README introductions, and website cards around practical user value. It helps repository maintainers describe what a tool enables and how to get started without implying unsupported endorsements.

Key features

  1. 01Rewrite repository descriptions
  2. 02Frame projects as usable tools
  3. 03Apply tool-card and README formulas
  4. 04Emphasize user benefit and setup
  5. 05Add accurate origin context

Use cases

  1. 01Write a GitHub About description
  2. 02Revise a README introduction
  3. 03Create a website tool card
  4. 04Clarify a tool's benefit and first step

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/arthurzakirov/proofstack --skill tool-positioning-for-repositories

After installing, type/tool-positioning-for-repositoriesin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Details

From the project README

Tool Positioning for Repositories Skill

Purpose

Rewrite GitHub repository names, About descriptions, README intros, and website tool cards so they communicate practical user value.

Principle

Do not frame repositories as portfolio projects. Frame them as tools the reader can use.

Tool Card Formula

Name -> user benefit -> setup path

Example:

AgentDesk - Make any machine ready for human and AI-agent work. Open the repository and follow the setup guide.

README Intro Formula

This tool helps you [achieve outcome] by [mechanism]. It is useful when [situation]. Start with [first action].

Benefit-Focused Description Patterns

  • "Make any machine ready for..."
  • "Turn high-volume X into repeatable Y..."
  • "Package X once. Install it anywhere."
  • "Convert messy Y into reusable Z."
  • "Create a repeatable operating system for..."
  • "Automate the boring path from X to Y."

Authority Enrichment

When truthful, add credible origin context:

Weak:

A setup script for my machine.

Better:

A workstation setup system adapted from senior engineering practices and customized for agentic AI workflows.

Rules:

  • Do not imply official endorsement.
  • Use "adapted from," "inspired by," "based on public guidance," or "learned from" when accurate.
  • Keep the reader benefit first.

Avoid

  • "This is my project."
  • "A portfolio project that..."
  • "Just a small tool..."
  • "Experimental repo..."
  • Negative positioning like "not a toy project."

Checklist

  • Does the reader know what they can use it for?
  • Is the first action obvious?
  • Does the description emphasize benefit over implementation?
  • Is authority added without false endorsement?
  • Is the one-liner short enough for a GitHub About field?

Comments

Markdown supported