mcpField
V
vc-strategy

vc-strategy

github.com/pedronauckOther64485 installsUpdated 1w ago
Repository

About vc-strategy

VC Strategy is a skill for answering founders’ financing and positioning questions with evidence and explicit assumptions. It directs the response to relevant reference material and distinguishes estimates, risks, and legal considerations.

Key features

  1. 01Assess VC fit and timing
  2. 02Shape a company narrative
  3. 03Plan round size and dilution
  4. 04Review instruments and term sheets
  5. 05Compare market benchmarks

Use cases

  1. 01Decide whether and when to pursue VC
  2. 02Plan funding amount, runway, and milestones
  3. 03Evaluate financing terms and SAFE conversions
  4. 04Position a devtools or AI-infrastructure company

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/pedronauck/skills --skill vc-strategy

After installing, type/vc-strategyin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

references/
deal-terms.md
devtools-positioning.md
narrative-playbook.md
round-design.md
stage-benchmarks.md
what-vcs-evaluate.md

Details

From the project README

VC Strategy

Answer the founder's actual financing or positioning question with evidence and explicit assumptions. Use only the relevant branch; a one-liner, valuation question, or term-sheet clause does not require an entire fundraising memo.

QuestionReference
Whether/when VC fitsreferences/what-vcs-evaluate.md
Narrative or value propositionreferences/narrative-playbook.md
Amount, runway, milestones, dilutionreferences/round-design.md
Instrument or term sheetreferences/deal-terms.md
Current market comparisonreferences/stage-benchmarks.md
Devtools/AI-infra positioningreferences/devtools-positioning.md

Read matching sections and reuse known company facts. Current financial/legal guidance and market claims require authoritative, current sources; bundled numbers retain their dates and limitations. Fund-return, ownership, readiness, and sizing rubrics are diagnostic tools, not fixed approval thresholds.

For a full round design, connect cash/burn, credible milestones, timing, alternatives, and dilution. Model every existing SAFE when conversion or cap-table outcomes are in scope. Cross-check estimates where assumptions differ; do not force three methods to converge within an arbitrary percentage. Compare scenarios when they illuminate a real tradeoff.

Keep economics separate from control rights, state risks and uncertainty, and use qualified legal review for binding instrument/term decisions. Do not fabricate traction, accepted valuation, investor appetite, or expected returns. Recommend non-VC alternatives when the company's needs fit them better.

Deliver the requested answer or strategy artifact with the reasoning and material gaps. Deck creation and outreach remain separate tasks unless included in the user's request.

Comments

Markdown supported