video-production

Video Production

You are the pipeline. There are no stages, checkpoints or event streams: you sequence the scripts, ask the user at decision points, and gate the output. Every other video skill owns one step; this one owns the order they run in, and the rules that only make sense across a whole run.

Requires

Four scripts ship with this skill: scripts/doctor.py (step 0's status report), scripts/normalize_audio.py (step 7's loudness fix), scripts/qc_render.py (step 8's gate) and scripts/poster.py (step 9's thumbnail shortlist). All stdlib-only; all want ffmpeg/ffprobe.

The rest of the sequence needs pip install 'video-studio-engine @ https://github.com/scrollmark/social-skills/archive/refs/heads/master.tar.gz' — video-studio setup (step 0's install plan), build_props (steps 5 and 7), studio (the preview editor) and preflight (the render gate) — plus render, which drives one of two backends. The default is the Scrollmark editor's scrollmark build + scrollmark render, installed by npx @scrollmark/cli — no licence, and the package carries the editor, so there is nothing to clone and no Studio to start first. --backend remotion still reaches the composer, which needs Node and a separate licence, and which renders three effects and the per-word caption emphasis the editor does not. Sourcing, voice and export belong to the step skills named below and carry their own install lines.

Skip the pip install and this skill still is not standalone — it drives the whole engine. There is no props document, no preview and no preflight, so the sequence has nothing to sequence. What survives is the shape: which decision must precede which, and where money and silence enter a run.

The Pipeline

#	Step	Owned by
0	Check the machine; offer to fix it; ask before installing	studio-setup
1	Enumerate formats/*.md, present as a choice, load only the chosen one	video-formats
2	Run that format's interview, ≤4 questions a round	agent-interview
3	Elicit sourcing — footage and audio in the same round	media-acquisition, audio-acquisition
4	Build the storyboard from the format's grammar	video-formats
5	video-studio build_props --placeholders, open the editor, re-read props.json	here
6	Resolve sources — TTS first, then footage; then video-studio verify_clips	audio-acquisition, media-acquisition
7	video-studio build_props (no flag) → video-studio preflight → video-studio render → scripts/normalize_audio.py	here
8	scripts/qc_render.py — the render against its plan — then pull frames and look at them	here
9	scripts/poster.py — pick the thumbnail, and open the candidate sheet	here

A brand kit (brand-kit) is applied at step 4. An export to a human editor (edit-handoff) and a composited subject (subject-compositing) are branches off steps 7 and 6, not extra steps. Per-step mechanics and the exact invocations are in references/run-mechanics.md.

Sequencing Rules

• scripts/doctor.py runs before sourcing is offered, at step 3. Offering a source with no key wastes the user's turn and makes the cost estimate wrong.
• Placeholder preview is the default before any spend. Step 5 is free and catches layout mistakes while they still are. --placeholders appears there and nowhere else in the run. The user's edits to props.json are authoritative — re-read it after they finish.
• Quote total cost before the first paid call and again after the last.
• Rebuild props immediately before every render, and never skip preflight. Both belong to the Remotion backend; the editor backend has no props file and no preflight, and its gate is scrollmark build refusing a storyboard whose sources do not resolve.
• Never declare a render done without viewing frames from it. "It rendered" and "it is correct" are different claims; only one of them is in the log.

The Two Contracts

Sources. Record the chosen source per layer in the storyboard as prompt: (generate) / find: (licensed search) / url: (user link) / file: (user path). A single video routinely mixes all four.

Paths. Each of those resolves from exactly one place — project/clips/<sceneId>-<layerId>.<ext> — the only path build_props reads, and it copies into composer/public/ itself. Hand-placing a file into composer/public/clips/ does not work; build_props never looks there and will placeholder or error.

One Machine, Several Agents

Projects cannot collide on content — each owns its props file, its media directory, and registers its own composition. They do share a port. Always open the editor with video-studio studio --project <dir>, never directly, or a second agent silently attaches to the first agent's editor and both then see one project. Hand the user the printed url verbatim: it ends in the composition id, and a bare localhost:<port> opens whichever composition the generated registry lists first — alphabetically, so the same one every time. Claim, --status and --release --port mechanics are in references/run-mechanics.md.

Read Before Rendering

references/hard-rules.md — the rules learned the expensive way: the placeholder-render trap, the clock rule, the cost table, and the render-side composer landmines. Do not start step 7 without it.

Step 8: what the gate does and does not cover

scripts/qc_render.py --video <render> --plan project/plan.json checks the file against the plan build_props wrote: duration, the plan's own consistency, a black tail, a frozen ending, and with --storyboard, resolution and fps. Non-zero exit, so it can gate. It decodes no frames — run it on every render.

The heavier gate does decode. video-studio qc_analyze --video <render> --project <dir> adds blur, off-palette colour, cut placement and caption timing, plus planned-subject checks with the model extras. Needs [qc]. Reach for it when a render surprises you, or before anything ships to a client.

Neither judges whether the video was worth making. The gate is two moves: run a checker, then scripts/poster.py and open the contact sheet — say which. To report a day's output, video-studio daily_digest turns git log and a runs/<date>/ tree into chat-sized plain text.

Anti-patterns

• Sourcing before layout is approved. Step 5 is free and step 6 is not.
• Rendering a placeholdered build. It looks finished. It is coloured boxes.
• Skipping preflight because the last build was fine. It is checking a global file that another project may have overwritten since.
• Narrating a clean bill of health at step 0. If nothing is missing, say nothing and get on with it.
• Reporting a regression as a footnote. A worse result than the previous version is a finding. Offer one fix-and-rerender loop, then stop.