mcpField
W
weekly-performance-digest

weekly-performance-digest

github.com/tradermontyData & databases3.4k2.7k installsUpdated 2d ago
Repository

About weekly-performance-digest

weekly-performance-digest is a Python skill for traders who want a weekly review of closed trades. It calculates performance metrics and pattern breakdowns, then produces JSON and Markdown reports without an API key.

Key features

  1. 01Weekly metrics for closed trades
  2. 02Breakdowns across trade patterns
  3. 03Highlights winners, losers, and lessons
  4. 04JSON and Markdown reports
  5. 05No API key required

Use cases

  1. 01Review realized performance at week end
  2. 02Compare outcomes by sector or exit reason
  3. 03Combine weekly reports for a month-end review

Install

Copy the command and run it in a terminal.

$npx skills add https://github.com/tradermonty/claude-trading-skills --skill weekly-performance-digest

After installing, type/weekly-performance-digestin Claude Code to confirm it loaded.

Bundled files

References and scripts installed along with SKILL.md.

requirements.txt
references/
weekly-digest-metrics.md
scripts/
generate_weekly_digest.py
scripts/tests/
conftest.py
test_generate_weekly_digest.py

Details

From the project README

Weekly Performance Digest

Overview

Weekly Performance Digest aggregates the trades you closed during a week into a single performance report. It reads CLOSED theses tracked by trader-memory-core (state/theses/th_*.yaml), computes headline metrics (win rate, expectancy, profit factor, R-multiple, MAE/MFE), breaks results down across several pattern dimensions (source skill, exit reason, thesis type, sector, mechanism tag, screening grade), and surfaces the week's biggest winners, losers, and lessons. Output is a JSON record plus a human-readable Markdown report. Pure calculation — no API key required.

When to Use

  • At the end of a trading week to review aggregate realized performance
  • To measure win rate and expectancy across all closed positions
  • To see which source skills, exit reasons, sectors, or mechanisms drove wins vs losses
  • To feed a month-end review (combine four weekly digests) or a postmortem
  • For a quick "what worked / what didn't" snapshot grounded in real closed trades

When Not to Use

  • For a single-trade deep review — use trade-performance-coach
  • For signal-level true/false-positive classification — use signal-postmortem
  • For buy/sell recommendations or position sizing — this skill is descriptive only

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.9+ with PyYAML (already a repo dependency)
  • A trader-memory-core state directory of thesis YAML files (state/theses/)
  • No API key required

Workflow

Step 1: Run the digest for a week
python3 skills/weekly-performance-digest/scripts/generate_weekly_digest.py \
  --state-dir state/theses \
  --from-date 2026-06-13 --to-date 2026-06-20 \
  --output-dir reports/ -v

Defaults: --state-dir state/theses, --from-date = 7 days before --to-date, --to-date = today, --output-dir reports/. With no date flags it digests the trailing 7 days.

Step 2: Read the report

The run writes reports/weekly_digest_<to-date>.json and reports/weekly_digest_<to-date>.md. Review the Markdown for the executive summary, metrics table, pattern breakdowns, and top winners/losers; consume the JSON downstream.

Step 3 (optional): Feed downstream

Combine several weekly JSON digests for a monthly review, or pass the JSON to a postmortem/coach step. The skill is descriptive — act on its findings via your normal review process.

How It Works

  • Trade selection. A trade counts in a week if its exit.actual_date falls in [from-date, to-date] and status == CLOSED.
  • Win/loss. outcome.pnl_dollars > 0 is a winner, < 0 a loser, == 0 breakeven; win_rate = winners / total_trades.
  • R-multiple. pnl_dollars / ((entry.actual_price − exit.stop_loss) × position.shares). (Stop-loss is read from exit.stop_loss, per the real thesis schema.)
  • Double-counting safeguard. A CLOSED thesis's outcome.pnl_dollars is the cumulative realized P&L across all trims plus the final leg. Headline metrics use that cumulative value over CLOSED theses only. The separate partial_trims block scans status_history[] of PARTIALLY_CLOSED theses only (still open) and is reported for information — it is never added into the headline totals/win-rate. A position trimmed in week 1 then closed in week 2 therefore shows as a partial trim in week 1 and inside week 2's CLOSED headline; that is intended, not a duplicate.

Output Format

JSON (weekly_digest_<to-date>.json)
{
  "schema_version": "1.0",
  "report_type": "weekly_performance_digest",
  "period": {"from": "2026-06-13", "to": "2026-06-20"},
  "generated_at": "2026-06-20T21:39:07Z",
  "summary": {
    "total_trades": 2, "winners": 1, "losers": 1, "breakeven": 0,
    "win_rate": 0.5, "expectancy": 25.0, "profit_factor": 2.0,
    "total_realized_pnl": 50.0, "total_realized_pnl_pct": 4.17
  },
  "metrics": {
    "avg_winner": 100.0, "avg_loser": -50.0,
    "largest_winner": 100.0, "largest_loser": -50.0,
    "avg_holding_days_winners": 9.0, "avg_holding_days_losers": 6.0,
    "r_multiple_avg": 0.25, "r_multiple_stdev": 1.06,
    "avg_mae_pct": -3.75, "avg_mfe_pct": 4.5
  },
  "pattern_analysis": {
    "by_source_skill": {"...": {"wins": 1, "losses": 0, "total": 1, "win_rate": 1.0}},
    "by_exit_reason": {}, "by_thesis_type": {}, "by_sector": {},
    "by_mechanism_tag": {}, "by_screening_grade": {}
  },
  "partial_trims": {"count": 0, "total_realized_pnl": 0.0, "trims": []},
  "lessons": {"top_wins": [], "top_losses": [], "process_improvements": []}
}
Markdown (weekly_digest_<to-date>.md)

Sections: # Weekly Performance Digest, ## Executive Summary, ## Performance Metrics, ## Pattern Analysis, ## Lessons Learned (### Top Winners / ### Top Losers / ### Process Improvements).

An empty week still produces a valid report with zeroed metrics (exit code 0).

Resources

  • scripts/generate_weekly_digest.py — digest generator (JSON + Markdown)
  • references/weekly-digest-metrics.md — metric formulas and interpretation

Key Principles

  1. Closed trades only for headline numbers — cumulative outcome.*, keyed on exit date.
  2. No double-counting — partial trims are informational and excluded from totals.
  3. Pattern attribution — every win/loss is attributed across multiple dimensions.
  4. Descriptive, not prescriptive — the digest reports; you decide.

Comments

Markdown supported