About zero-script-qa
zero-script-qa is a QA methodology for development and testing teams that uses structured logs and live monitoring. It combines manual UX testing with AI log analysis to detect and document issues without requiring test scripts.
Key features
- 01Structured JSON logging standards
- 02Cross-service Request ID tracking
- 03Real-time Docker log monitoring
- 04AI analysis of errors and latency
- 05QA issue documentation
Use cases
- 01Detect errors during manual feature testing
- 02Trace requests across layers by Request ID
- 03Monitor slow responses and repeated failures
- 04Review logging settings across environments
Install
Copy the command and run it in a terminal.
$
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ ww-w-ai/ bkit-claude-code --skill zero-script-qaAfter installing, type/zero-script-qain Claude Code to confirm it loaded.
Details
From the project READMEZero Script QA Expert Knowledge
Overview
Zero Script QA is a methodology that verifies features through structured logs and real-time monitoring without writing test scripts.
Traditional: Write test code → Execute → Check results → Maintain
Zero Script: Build log infrastructure → Manual UX test → AI log analysis → Auto issue detection
Core Principles
1. Log Everything
- All API calls (including 200 OK)
- All errors
- All important business events
- Entire flow trackable via Request ID
2. Structured JSON Logs
- Parseable JSON format
- Consistent fields (timestamp, level, request_id, message, data)
- Different log levels per environment
3. Real-time Monitoring
- Docker log streaming
- Claude Code analyzes in real-time
- Immediate issue detection and documentation
Logging Architecture
JSON Log Format Standard
{
"timestamp": "2026-01-08T10:30:00.000Z",
"level": "INFO",
"service": "api",
"request_id": "req_abc123",
"message": "API Request completed",
"data": {
"method": "POST",
"path": "/api/users",
"status": 200,
"duration_ms": 45
}
}
Required Log Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| timestamp | ISO 8601 | Time of occurrence |
| level | string | DEBUG, INFO, WARNING, ERROR |
| service | string | Service name (api, web, worker, etc.) |
| request_id | string | Request tracking ID |
| message | string | Log message |
| data | object | Additional data (optional) |
Log Level Policy
| Environment | Minimum Level | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Local | DEBUG | Development and QA |
| Staging | DEBUG | QA and integration testing |
| Production | INFO | Operations monitoring |
Request ID Propagation
Concept
Client → API Gateway → Backend → Database
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
req_abc req_abc req_abc req_abc
Trackable with same Request ID across all layers
Implementation Patterns
1. Request ID Generation (Entry Point)
// middleware.ts
import { v4 as uuidv4 } from 'uuid';
export function generateRequestId(): string {
return `req_${uuidv4().slice(0, 8)}`;
}
// Propagate via header
headers['X-Request-ID'] = requestId;
2. Request ID Extraction and Propagation
// API client
const requestId = headers['X-Request-ID'] || generateRequestId();
// Include in all logs
logger.info('Processing request', { request_id: requestId });
// Include in header when calling downstream services
await fetch(url, {
headers: { 'X-Request-ID': requestId }
});
Backend Logging (FastAPI)
Logging Middleware
# middleware/logging.py
import logging
import time
import uuid
import json
from fastapi import Request
class JsonFormatter(logging.Formatter):
def format(self, record):
log_record = {
"timestamp": self.formatTime(record),
"level": record.levelname,
"service": "api",
"request_id": getattr(record, 'request_id', 'N/A'),
"message": record.getMessage(),
}
if hasattr(record, 'data'):
log_record["data"] = record.data
return json.dumps(log_record)
class LoggingMiddleware:
async def __call__(self, request: Request, call_next):
request_id = request.headers.get('X-Request-ID', f'req_{uuid.uuid4().hex[:8]}')
request.state.request_id = request_id
start_time = time.time()
# Request logging
logger.info(
f"Request started",
extra={
'request_id': request_id,
'data': {
'method': request.method,
'path': request.url.path,
'query': str(request.query_params)
}
}
)
response = await call_next(request)
duration = (time.time() - start_time) * 1000
# Response logging (including 200 OK!)
logger.info(
f"Request completed",
extra={
'request_id': request_id,
'data': {
'status': response.status_code,
'duration_ms': round(duration, 2)
}
}
)
response.headers['X-Request-ID'] = request_id
return response
Business Logic Logging
# services/user_service.py
def create_user(data: dict, request_id: str):
logger.info("Creating user", extra={
'request_id': request_id,
'data': {'email': data['email']}
})
# Business logic
user = User(**data)
db.add(user)
db.commit()
logger.info("User created", extra={
'request_id': request_id,
'data': {'user_id': user.id}
})
return user
Frontend Logging (Next.js)
Logger Module
// lib/logger.ts
type LogLevel = 'DEBUG' | 'INFO' | 'WARNING' | 'ERROR';
interface LogData {
request_id?: string;
[key: string]: any;
}
const LOG_LEVELS: Record<LogLevel, number> = {
DEBUG: 0,
INFO: 1,
WARNING: 2,
ERROR: 3,
};
const MIN_LEVEL = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' ? 'INFO' : 'DEBUG';
function log(level: LogLevel, message: string, data?: LogData) {
if (LOG_LEVELS[level] < LOG_LEVELS[MIN_LEVEL]) return;
const logEntry = {
timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
level,
service: 'web',
request_id: data?.request_id || 'N/A',
message,
data: data ? { ...data, request_id: undefined } : undefined,
};
console.log(JSON.stringify(logEntry));
}
export const logger = {
debug: (msg: string, data?: LogData) => log('DEBUG', msg, data),
info: (msg: string, data?: LogData) => log('INFO', msg, data),
warning: (msg: string, data?: LogData) => log('WARNING', msg, data),
error: (msg: string, data?: LogData) => log('ERROR', msg, data),
};
API Client Integration
// lib/api-client.ts
import { logger } from './logger';
import { v4 as uuidv4 } from 'uuid';
export async function apiClient<T>(
endpoint: string,
options: RequestInit = {}
): Promise<T> {
const requestId = `req_${uuidv4().slice(0, 8)}`;
const startTime = Date.now();
logger.info('API Request started', {
request_id: requestId,
method: options.method || 'GET',
endpoint,
});
try {
const response = await fetch(`/api${endpoint}`, {
...options,
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'X-Request-ID': requestId,
...options.headers,
},
});
const duration = Date.now() - startTime;
const data = await response.json();
// Log 200 OK too!
logger.info('API Request completed', {
request_id: requestId,
status: response.status,
duration_ms: duration,
});
if (!response.ok) {
logger.error('API Request failed', {
request_id: requestId,
status: response.status,
error: data.error,
});
throw new ApiError(data.error);
}
return data;
} catch (error) {
logger.error('API Request error', {
request_id: requestId,
error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error',
});
throw error;
}
}
Nginx JSON Logging
nginx.conf Configuration
http {
log_format json_combined escape=json '{'
'"timestamp":"$time_iso8601",'
'"level":"INFO",'
'"service":"nginx",'
'"request_id":"$http_x_request_id",'
'"message":"HTTP Request",'
'"data":{'
'"remote_addr":"$remote_addr",'
'"method":"$request_method",'
'"uri":"$request_uri",'
'"status":$status,'
'"body_bytes_sent":$body_bytes_sent,'
'"request_time":$request_time,'
'"upstream_response_time":"$upstream_response_time",'
'"http_referer":"$http_referer",'
'"http_user_agent":"$http_user_agent"'
'}'
'}';
access_log /var/log/nginx/access.log json_combined;
}
Docker-Based QA Workflow
docker-compose.yml Configuration
version: '3.8'
services:
api:
build: ./backend
environment:
- LOG_LEVEL=DEBUG
- LOG_FORMAT=json
logging:
driver: json-file
options:
max-size: "10m"
max-file: "3"
web:
build: ./frontend
environment:
- NODE_ENV=development
depends_on:
- api
nginx:
image: nginx:alpine
volumes:
- ./nginx/nginx.conf:/etc/nginx/nginx.conf
ports:
- "80:80"
depends_on:
- api
- web
Real-time Log Monitoring
# Stream all service logs
docker compose logs -f
# Specific service only
docker compose logs -f api
# Filter errors only
docker compose logs -f | grep '"level":"ERROR"'
# Track specific Request ID
docker compose logs -f | grep 'req_abc123'
QA Automation Workflow
1. Start Environment
# Start development environment
docker compose up -d
# Start log monitoring (Claude Code monitors)
docker compose logs -f
2. Manual UX Testing
User tests actual features in browser:
1. Sign up attempt
2. Login attempt
3. Use core features
4. Test edge cases
3. Claude Code Log Analysis
Claude Code in real-time:
1. Monitor log stream
2. Detect error patterns
3. Detect abnormal response times
4. Track entire flow via Request ID
5. Auto-document issues
4. Issue Documentation
# QA Issue Report
## Issues Found
### ISSUE-001: Insufficient error handling on login failure
- **Request ID**: req_abc123
- **Severity**: Medium
- **Reproduction path**: Login → Wrong password
- **Log**:
```json
{"level":"ERROR","message":"Login failed","data":{"error":"Invalid credentials"}}
- Problem: Error message not user-friendly
- Recommended fix: Add error code to message mapping
---
## Issue Detection Patterns
### 1. Error Detection
```json
{"level":"ERROR","message":"..."}
→ Report immediately
2. Slow Response Detection
{"data":{"duration_ms":3000}}
→ Warning when exceeding 1000ms
3. Consecutive Failure Detection
3+ consecutive failures on same endpoint
→ Report potential system issue
4. Abnormal Status Codes
{"data":{"status":500}}
→ Report 5xx errors immediately
Phase Integration
| Phase | Zero Script QA Integration |
|---|---|
| Phase 4 (API) | API response logging verification |
| Phase 6 (UI) | Frontend logging verification |
| Phase 7 (Security) | Security event logging verification |
| Phase 8 (Review) | Log quality review |
| Phase 9 (Deployment) | Production log level configuration |
Iterative Test Cycle Pattern
Based on bkamp.ai notification feature development:
Example: 8-Cycle Test Process
| Cycle | Pass Rate | Bug Found | Fix Applied |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | 30% | DB schema mismatch | Schema migration |
| 2nd | 45% | NULL handling missing | Add null checks |
| 3rd | 55% | Routing error | Fix deeplinks |
| 4th | 65% | Type mismatch | Fix enum types |
| 5th | 70% | Calculation error | Fix count logic |
| 6th | 75% | Event missing | Add event triggers |
| 7th | 82% | Cache sync issue | Fix cache invalidation |
| 8th | 89% | Stable | Final polish |
Cycle Workflow
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Iterative Test Cycle │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Cycle N: │
│ 1. Run test script (E2E or manual) │
│ 2. Claude monitors logs in real-time │
│ 3. Record pass/fail results │
│ 4. Claude identifies root cause of failures │
│ 5. Fix code immediately (hot reload) │
│ 6. Document: Cycle N → Bug → Fix │
│ │
│ Repeat until acceptable pass rate (>85%) │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
E2E Test Script Template
#!/bin/bash
# E2E Test Script Template
API_URL="http://localhost:8000"
TOKEN="your-test-token"
PASS_COUNT=0
FAIL_COUNT=0
SKIP_COUNT=0
GREEN='\033[0;32m'
RED='\033[0;31m'
YELLOW='\033[0;33m'
NC='\033[0m'
test_feature_action() {
echo -n "Testing: Feature action... "
response=$(curl -s -X POST "$API_URL/api/v1/feature/action" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"param": "value"}')
if [[ "$response" == *"expected_result"* ]]; then
echo -e "${GREEN}✅ PASS${NC}"
((PASS_COUNT++))
else
echo -e "${RED}❌ FAIL${NC}"
echo "Response: $response"
((FAIL_COUNT++))
fi
}
# Run all tests
test_feature_action
# ... more tests
# Summary
echo ""
echo "═══════════════════════════════════════"
echo "Test Results:"
echo -e " ${GREEN}✅ PASS: $PASS_COUNT${NC}"
echo -e " ${RED}❌ FAIL: $FAIL_COUNT${NC}"
echo -e " ${YELLOW}⏭️ SKIP: $SKIP_COUNT${NC}"
echo "═══════════════════════════════════════"
Test Cycle Documentation Template
# Feature Test Results - Cycle N
## Summary
- **Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
- **Feature**: {feature name}
- **Pass Rate**: N%
- **Tests**: X passed / Y total
## Results
| Test Case | Status | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Test 1 | ✅ | |
| Test 2 | ❌ | {error description} |
| Test 3 | ⏭️ | {skip reason} |
## Bugs Found
### BUG-001: {Title}
- **Root Cause**: {description}
- **Fix**: {what was changed}
- **Files**: `path/to/file.py:123`
## Next Cycle Plan
- {what to test next}
Checklist
Logging Infrastructure
- JSON log format applied
- Request ID generation and propagation
- Log level settings per environment
- Docker logging configuration
Backend Logging
- Logging middleware implemented
- All API calls logged (including 200 OK)
- Business logic logging
- Detailed error logging
Frontend Logging
- Logger module implemented
- API client integration
- Error boundary logging
QA Workflow
- Docker Compose configured
- Real-time monitoring ready
- Issue documentation template ready
Auto-Apply Rules
When Building Logging Infrastructure
When implementing API/Backend:
- Suggest logging middleware creation
- Suggest JSON format logger setup
- Add Request ID generation/propagation logic
When implementing Frontend:
- Suggest Logger module creation
- Suggest logging integration with API client
- Suggest including Request ID header
When Performing QA
On test request:
- Guide to run
docker compose logs -f - Request manual UX testing from user
- Real-time log monitoring
- Document issues immediately when detected
- Provide fix suggestions
Issue Detection Thresholds
| Severity | Condition | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | level: ERROR or status: 5xx | Immediate report |
| Critical | duration_ms > 3000 | Immediate report |
| Critical | 3+ consecutive failures | Immediate report |
| Warning | status: 401, 403 | Warning report |
| Warning | duration_ms > 1000 | Warning report |
| Info | Missing log fields | Note for improvement |
| Info | Request ID not propagated | Note for improvement |
Required Logging Locations
Backend (FastAPI/Express)
✅ Request start (method, path, params)
✅ Request complete (status, duration_ms)
✅ Major business logic steps
✅ Detailed info on errors
✅ Before/after external API calls
✅ DB queries (in development)
Frontend (Next.js/React)
✅ API call start
✅ API response received (status, duration)
✅ Detailed info on errors
✅ Important user actions
Comments
Markdown supported