Skills
97,222 packaged capabilities and playbooks for agents. Install any of them with one command.
Security
Reviews AI agent architectures for security risks including permission model design, least-privilege enforcement, human-in-the-loop gate placement, blast radius containment, audit trail completeness, rollback capability, and multi-agent trust boundaries. Auto-invoked when reviewing agentic AI systems where LLMs invoke tools, take autonomous actions, or operate in multi-agent configurations. Produces a structured architecture security assessment mapped to OWASP Agentic AI threats and NIST AI RMF 1.0.
Comprehensive Android mobile application penetration testing with rooted-device ADB and Frida-based MCP tooling. Covers OWASP MASTG full methodology: recon, static + dynamic analysis, SSL/root bypass, IPC fuzzing, data exfiltration, crypto audit, and reporting. Triggers on requests to pentest Android apps, analyze APKs, bypass mobile security controls, or run MASVS/MASTG assessments.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AD CS, certificate templates, enrollment rights, EKUs, SAN controls, PKINIT, certificate mapping, and cert-based privilege paths. Use when the user asks about ESC-style abuse, certificate templates, enrollment agents, EKUs, SAN or subject controls, smartcard or PKINIT logon, CA policy, or how an issued cert turns into accepted privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AI-agent, prompt-injection, MCP or toolchain, cloud, container, CI/CD, and supply-chain challenges. Use when the user asks to analyze prompt-to-tool flows, retrieval poisoning, mounted secrets, deployment drift, runtime-vs-manifest mismatches, registry provenance, or CI-produced artifacts under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for browser cookies, localStorage, sessionStorage, IndexedDB, Cache Storage, service workers, offline caches, and client-side session persistence. Use when the user asks to inspect browser state, replay cached auth or session behavior, explain why a page behaves differently after load, or trace how stored client state changes requests, rendering, or access. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for cloud metadata services, instance identity, workload identity, link-local credential paths, role assumption, and metadata-to-privilege trust edges. Use when the user asks to inspect metadata-service access, instance credentials, pod or workload identity, link-local token paths, SSRF-to-metadata escalation, or explain how metadata-derived credentials turn into accepted cloud or control-plane privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for custom binary or text protocol recovery, handshake reconstruction, framing, sequence control, checksums, stateful replay, and accepted-session reproduction. Use when the user asks to decode an unknown protocol, recover custom framing, build a replay harness, satisfy sequence or checksum rules, replay a captured session, or prove the smallest message order that reaches an accepted branch. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for DPAPI masterkeys, vault blobs, browser credential stores, protected secrets, domain backup keys, and secret-to-acceptance replay chains. Use when the user asks to inspect DPAPI blobs or masterkeys, recover browser or vault credentials, trace DPAPI context or backup-key use, or explain how protected Windows secrets become accepted access or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for file uploads, imports, previews, archive extraction, format conversion, parser invocation, and deserialization chains. Use when the user asks to inspect an upload or import path, trace archive extraction, preview or converter behavior, explain how a file reaches a parser or deserializer, or connect one uploaded artifact to the decisive backend effect. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for firmware images, partition tables, boot chains, update packages, extracted filesystems, embedded configs, and device-facing trust boundaries. Use when the user asks to unpack firmware, map partition layout, inspect bootloader or init chains, recover update keys or credentials, trace config loading, or explain how a device surface reaches the decisive artifact. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for DFIR chronology, cross-artifact correlation, persistence chains, and incident timeline reconstruction. Use when the user asks to build a forensic timeline, correlate EVTX, PCAP, registry, disk, memory, mailbox, or browser artifacts, explain the order of attacker actions, or pinpoint the stage where the decisive artifact appears. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Active Directory, Kerberos, LDAP, OAuth, enterprise messaging, Windows host forensics, credential material, and lateral-movement challenges. Use when the user asks to trace tickets or tokens, inspect mailbox rules, analyze Windows host evidence, understand an AD trust path, or explain a lateral-movement chain across sandbox-linked nodes. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Kerberos delegation, SPN trust edges, S4U abuse, RBCD, constrained or unconstrained delegation, and service-ticket acceptance. Use when the user asks about constrained delegation, unconstrained delegation, RBCD, S4U, SPNs, ticket acceptance, or how a Kerberos trust edge turns into effective privilege under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Linux credential artifacts, service tokens, SSH material, cloud and container secrets, socket-level trust, and host-to-host pivot chains. Use when the user asks to trace Linux auth artifacts, accepted token or key replay, socket or service-account trust edges, sudo or capability abuse, or explain lateral movement across Linux challenge nodes. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for LSASS-resident secrets, Windows logon sessions, Kerberos ticket caches, DPAPI-backed material, SSP artifacts, and replayable credential extraction. Use when the user asks to inspect LSASS memory, recover tickets or logon sessions, trace DPAPI or SSP material, distinguish which credential artifacts are replayable, or connect host-resident credential material to an accepted pivot or privilege edge. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for enterprise mail abuse, OAuth consent, inbox or forwarding rules, transport rules, shared mailbox access, phishing chains, and token-to-mailbox side effects. Use when the user asks to trace mailbox rules, OAuth consent grants, forwarding or delegate abuse, shared mailbox access, message-trace evidence, or explain how mail artifacts turn into persistence, exfiltration, or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for malware configuration recovery, staged payload boundaries, beacon parameter extraction, and IOC decoding. Use when the user asks to recover a malware config, decode C2 or beacon fields, unpack staged payloads, extract bot or campaign IDs, or tie recovered config to observed protocol behavior under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for OAuth, OIDC, redirect flows, state or nonce handling, PKCE, token exchange, refresh logic, claim mapping, and accepted login paths. Use when the user asks to trace redirects, callback parameters, scopes, state, nonce, PKCE, refresh tokens, consent, or explain how an OAuth or OIDC chain turns into accepted identity or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for packet capture analysis, session reconstruction, application-protocol decoding, stream reassembly, beacon timing, and packet-to-process correlation. Use when the user asks to analyze a PCAP, rebuild TCP or UDP sessions, decode HTTP, WebSocket, DNS, custom C2, or binary protocols, extract transferred artifacts, or tie packet sequences to host or malware behavior. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for prompt-injection, retrieval poisoning, memory contamination, planner drift, MCP or tool-boundary abuse, and agent exfiltration challenges. Use when the user asks to analyze prompt injection, retrieval poisoning, memory contamination, planner drift, tool-argument corruption, or secret exposure caused by an agent chain. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for forced-auth coercion, relay chains, target selection, NTLM or related acceptance paths, and coercion-to-privilege transitions. Use when the user asks to trace a coercion primitive, follow a relay path, analyze forced authentication, determine which service accepts relayed auth, or connect a coercion step to resulting privilege, enrollment, or code execution. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for reverse engineering, malware, DFIR, firmware, pwnable, and native exploit challenges. Use when the user asks to reverse a binary, unpack a sample, inspect a memory dump or PCAP, recover malware behavior, debug a crash, or build or verify an exploit chain under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for reverse proxies, Host headers, forwarded headers, vhost routing, websocket upgrades, path-prefix rewriting, base-URL derivation, and multi-node route resolution. Use when the user asks which host or container serves a route, why a public-looking domain still belongs to the sandbox, how headers or proxies change behavior, or how a route resolves across proxy, container, and worker boundaries. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for SSRF reachability, internal route probing, metadata-service access, credential pivoting, and token-to-accepted-privilege chains. Use when the user asks to trace SSRF sources, internal hosts, metadata endpoints, link-local tokens, service-account credentials, or explain how a server-side fetch edge turns into accepted access. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for CI/CD, registry, dependency drift, artifact provenance, image build, release pipeline, and runtime consumer challenges. Use when the user asks to trace dependency drift, registry pulls, malicious packages, build or release tampering, CI execution, artifact signing, or which shipped artifact the runtime actually consumes. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Kerberos, WinRM, SMB, RDP, Windows credential material, replayable tickets, delegation edges, and host-to-host pivot chains. Use when the user asks to replay Kerberos material, trace a WinRM, SMB, or RDP pivot, understand host-to-host privilege movement, or prove which Windows service accepted a credential or ticket. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Triages and prioritizes CVEs using CVSS 4.0, SSVC 2.1 decision trees, EPSS scores, and CISA KEV catalog cross-referencing. Auto-invoked when a CVE ID is mentioned, vulnerability scan results are shared, or the user asks "should we patch this?" Produces a prioritized remediation recommendation with SLA assignment and business risk context.
Guidance for Microsoft Defender for APIs — a Defender for Cloud plan that discovers, prioritizes by risk, and protects APIs published in Azure API Management against threats and abuse. Covers onboarding, security findings, and threat detection. WHEN: Defender for APIs, API threat protection, secure APIs in API Management, API security posture, detect API abuse, onboard APIs to Defender, API attack detection, sensitive data exposure in APIs.
Blocks dangerous commands before execution via a Rust-based Claude Code hook. Use when configuring agent safety guards, setting up destructive command blocking, or auditing CLI protection rules. Use for git reset protection, rm -rf interception, force-push blocking, pack-based command filtering, and PreToolUse hook safety.
Performs a structured DNS security review against NIST SP 800-81 Rev 2 (Secure Domain Name System Deployment Guide) and CIS Controls v8 (Control 9.2 -- Use DNS Filtering Services). Auto-invoked when reviewing DNS configurations, DNSSEC deployment, or investigating DNS-based exfiltration and tunneling indicators. Produces a DNS security assessment covering DNSSEC validation, protective DNS, and exfiltration detection patterns.
Elite incident response and legal compliance guidance for data breaches under GDPR Articles 33 & 34. Use when: (1) User reports a data breach or security incident — including "is this even a personal data breach?" triage, (2) User asks about breach notification obligations or deadlines, (3) User mentions "72 hours", Art. 33, Art. 34, or notification requirements, (4) Discussion involves security incidents affecting personal data, (5) User needs breach risk assessment using ENISA methodology, (6) User mentions "Data Breach" or "Incident" or "Data Leakage" or "Ransomware" or "Exfiltration", (7) User needs to determine Controller vs Processor obligations, (8) Cross-border breach scenarios requiring Lead SA determination, (9) User needs a mitigation playbook or immediate response recommendations, (10) User needs audit-ready breach documentation (.docx) or an EDPB-template-aligned breach notification / evidence file — including follow-up and withdrawal notifications, (11) Breach involves an AI system requiring AI Act Art. 73 serious incident screening.
Audit Go module dependencies: detect outdated packages, check for known vulnerabilities, review go.mod hygiene, identify unused or redundant deps, and evaluate dependency quality. Use when auditing dependencies, checking for CVEs, cleaning up go.mod, upgrading modules, or evaluating third-party packages. Trigger examples: "check dependencies", "audit deps", "go.mod review", "update modules", "vulnerability scan", "govulncheck". Do NOT use for code-level security issues (use go-security-audit) or architecture review (use go-architecture-review).
Configures GitHub Advanced Security (code scanning with CodeQL, secret scanning, dependency review, and Dependabot alerts) to perform automated static analysis and vulnerability detection across repositories at enterprise scale, including custom CodeQL queries and CI workflow integration. Use when setting up or tuning code scanning, rolling out CodeQL across an organization, or shifting SAST left into pull request workflows.
Security review for Omarchy Quattro plugins (Quickshell/QML bar widgets with bash, python or node helpers) before submitting to the plugin marketplace. Use when writing, auditing or hardening an Omarchy plugin, when a marketplace issue gets needs-fixes or security-needs-fixes, when preparing a [Plugin] or [Verify] submission, or when the user asks whether a plugin is safe to publish. Based on every maintainer review comment in the marketplace repository.
Reviews CI/CD pipeline configurations against SLSA v1.0 build levels and OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks. Auto-invoked when reviewing GitHub Actions workflows, GitLab CI configs, Jenkins pipelines, or when discussing supply chain security. Produces a pipeline security assessment with SLSA level determination and CICD-SEC risk findings.
Review Convex security audit patterns for authentication and authorization. Use for auditing query/mutation auth, row-level security, and validators. Use proactively when reviewing Convex apps (convex/ directory present). Examples: - user: "Audit these Convex mutations" → check for missing ctx.auth and input validators - user: "Check for IDOR in Convex queries" → verify ownership checks on document access - user: "Review Convex HTTP actions" → check for signature verification on webhooks - user: "Secure these Convex queries" → implement custom functions for enforced auth - user: "Check for data leaks in subscriptions" → verify filtered result sets
WooYun business logic vulnerability methodology — 22,132 real cases across 6 domains (authentication bypass, authorization bypass, payment tampering, information disclosure, logic flaws, misconfiguration) and 33 vulnerability classes. Use for ANY security testing, auditing, or code review of web apps, APIs, or business systems — even without explicit "security" keywords. Triggers: penetration testing, security audit, vulnerability, bug bounty, payment security, IDOR, password reset, weak credentials, unauthorized access, race condition, parameter tampering, code review, 渗透测试, 安全审计, 漏洞挖掘, 支付安全, 越权, 逻辑漏洞, 业务安全, SRC, 代码审计. Also triggers on implicit intent: "test this endpoint", "find bugs", "can I bypass this", "帮我测测这个接口", "这个参数能不能改", "帮我找bug".
Create, update, and manage SLAS (Shopper Login and API Access Service) clients using the b2c CLI. Use this skill whenever the user needs to provision a SLAS client, update OAuth scopes, rotate client secrets, get a shopper access token, or configure shopper authentication for headless, PWA, or Storefront Next (SFNext) storefronts — even if they just say "I need a shopper token" or "set up auth for my storefront".
Performs a container and Kubernetes security review against the CIS Docker Benchmark v1.6.0, CIS Kubernetes Benchmark v1.9.0, and NIST SP 800-190. Auto-invoked when reviewing Dockerfiles, Kubernetes manifests, Helm charts, or container orchestration configurations. Evaluates image security, runtime hardening, RBAC, Pod Security Standards, network policies, and secrets management. Produces a prioritized findings report with remediation guidance.
Use when the user asks for a deep, exhaustive, multi-pass, or variance-reducing repository-wide or scoped-path Codex Security scan. Run repeated independent Standard scans with the Codex Security deep-scan tool. Do not use for PRs, commits, branch diffs, or working-tree diffs
Guidance for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) — enterprise endpoint security with next-gen AV, EDR, attack surface reduction (ASR), Defender Vulnerability Management, automated investigation and remediation (AIR), and live response. Covers Plan 1 vs Plan 2 selection, onboarding paths (Intune, Configuration Manager, GPO, scripts), ASR rule rollout in audit→block, EDR in block mode, tamper protection, device groups and RBAC, and response actions (isolate, restrict, live response). WHEN: Defender for Endpoint, MDE, MDE onboarding, endpoint EDR, attack surface reduction rules, ASR rules audit mode, next-gen antivirus policy, device isolation, endpoint vulnerability management, EDR block mode, tamper protection, onboard devices to Defender, live response, MDE Plan 1 vs Plan 2, security settings management, MDE for Linux, MDE for macOS, controlled folder access. DO NOT USE for non-endpoint Defender workloads (use defender-xdr for cross-workload, defender-for-cloud-hardening for Azure resources).
Expert-level reverse engineering and binary debugging skill. Use this skill whenever the user wants to analyze, decompile, disassemble, or debug binaries, executables, APKs, iOS apps, firmware, or obfuscated code. Triggers for: static analysis, dynamic analysis, malware analysis, exploit development, CTF challenges, binary patching, anti-debug bypass, protocol reversing, memory forensics, hooking, frida scripting, GDB/LLDB debugging, radare2, Ghidra, jadx, apktool, strings analysis, symbol resolution, or any request involving "reverse engineer", "RE", "decompile", "disassemble", "patch binary", "debug crash", "analyze malware", "bypass protection", "hook function", "intercept traffic", "find vulnerability", or examining unknown file formats. Always load this skill for CTF pwn/rev challenges, app security assessments, and firmware analysis.
Scores Kubernetes resource manifests with Kubesec to flag misconfiguration and privilege-escalation risk before deployment, mapping each finding back to the securityContext change that fixes it. Use when gating manifests in CI, reviewing YAML or a rendered chart before it reaches a cluster, or explaining why a manifest scored negatively. Keywords: Kubesec, manifest score, securityContext, readOnlyRootFilesystem, runAsNonRoot, CI gate. Do not use for scanning built images for CVEs - use scanning-docker-images-with-trivy; for admission-time enforcement use implementing-opa-gatekeeper-for-policy-enforcement.
Runs security audits on codebases — full scans, diff reviews, threat models, vulnerability triage, remediation guidance, and finding tracking. Activate when the user says "security scan", "audit this repo", "review this PR for security", "threat model", "triage vulnerabilities", "fix this vuln", or "track findings".
New to MCP?
From what the protocol is to installing your first server, these answers cover most first questions.
An open protocol that defines how AI applications connect to external tools and data in a uniform way. Clients talk to the model; MCP servers provide tools, resources and prompt templates. They exchange standard messages, so one server can be reused by many clients.