mcpField
C
competitive-strategist

competitive-strategist

github.com/ncklrsマーケティング・グロース53154 回インストール35 週間前に更新
リポジトリ

competitive-strategist について

Competitive Strategist は、競合調査、市場分析、ポジショニング、営業支援を体系化するスキルです。顧客ニーズと根拠に基づく比較を重視し、勝敗分析、バトルカード、メッセージング、モニタリングを扱います。

主な機能

  1. 01競合調査と分析のガイダンス
  2. 02勝敗分析と市場構造のフレームワーク
  3. 03バトルカードの作成と管理
  4. 04ポジショニングと反論対応の指針
  5. 05競合モニタリングと営業支援

活用シーン

  1. 01主要な競合向けバトルカードの準備
  2. 02勝敗案件の分析による差別化要因の特定
  3. 03競合に関する反論への対応策の作成

インストール

コマンドをコピーしてターミナルで実行します。

$npx skills add https://github.com/ncklrs/startup-os-skills --skill competitive-strategist

インストール後、Claude Code で/competitive-strategistを入力して読み込まれたか確認します。

同梱ファイル

SKILL.md と一緒にインストールされる参考資料やスクリプト。

rules/
_sections.md
analysis-win-loss.md
battlecard-creation.md
comparison-feature-strategy.md
enablement-sales-training.md
landscape-mapping.md
messaging-competitive-claims.md
messaging-objection-handling.md
monitoring-systems.md
positioning-differentiation.md
research-methodologies.md

README(原文)English

プロジェクトの README より

この README の日本語訳はまだありません。以下は英語の原文です。日本語の紹介はページ上部をご覧ください。

Competitive Strategist

Expert competitive intelligence and positioning guidance for winning in crowded markets — from research methodologies to sales enablement and everything in between.

Philosophy

Competitive strategy isn't about copying competitors or tearing them down:

  1. Know yourself first — You can't position against others until you know your own strengths
  2. Focus on customers, not competitors — What they need matters more than what rivals do
  3. Be honest — Lies and FUD destroy credibility faster than any competitor
  4. Stay current — Markets move fast; stale intel costs deals

How This Skill Works

When invoked, apply the guidelines in rules/ organized by:

  • research-* — Competitive research methodologies and intelligence gathering
  • analysis-* — Win/loss analysis and market landscape mapping
  • battlecard-* — Battlecard creation, structure, and maintenance
  • positioning-* — Positioning against alternatives and differentiation
  • messaging-* — Competitive messaging and objection handling
  • enablement-* — Sales enablement for competitive situations
  • monitoring-* — Competitive monitoring systems and alerts

Core Frameworks

The Competitive Intelligence Cycle
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                                                             │
│   ┌──────────┐    ┌──────────┐    ┌──────────┐             │
│   │  GATHER  │───▶│ ANALYZE  │───▶│  SHARE   │             │
│   │  (Intel) │    │ (Insight)│    │ (Enable) │             │
│   └──────────┘    └──────────┘    └──────────┘             │
│        ▲                                │                   │
│        │          ┌──────────┐          │                   │
│        └──────────│  UPDATE  │◀─────────┘                   │
│                   │ (Iterate)│                              │
│                   └──────────┘                              │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Competitive Positioning Matrix
Positioning TypeWhen to UseKey Approach
Head-to-headYou're stronger on key dimensionsDirect comparison
Niche downCompetitor owns general categoryOwn a specific segment
ReframeCompetitor's strength is irrelevantChange the criteria
LeapfrogNew capability they can't matchFuture-oriented vision
CoexistDifferent jobs to be doneComplement, don't compete
Competitor Tiers
TierDescriptionMonitoring FrequencyDepth of Analysis
PrimaryDirect competitors, same ICPWeeklyDeep battlecards
SecondaryAdjacent solutions, partial overlapMonthlyOverview cards
EmergingStartups, potential disruptorsQuarterlyWatch list
AlternativesStatus quo, DIY, spreadsheetsOngoingPain point mapping
Win/Loss Analysis Framework
Deal Outcome
    │
    ├── Won Against Competitor
    │   ├── What differentiated us?
    │   ├── What did they say about competitor?
    │   └── What would have changed their mind?
    │
    └── Lost to Competitor
        ├── What was the deciding factor?
        ├── Where did we fall short?
        └── What could we have done differently?
The Battlecard Structure
SectionPurposeUpdate Frequency
OverviewQuick context, what they doQuarterly
PositioningHow we win, key differentiatorsMonthly
LandminesQuestions to ask that expose weaknessesAs discovered
Objection HandlingResponses to "Why not [competitor]?"As encountered
Proof PointsCustomer quotes, case studiesAs available
Pricing IntelKnown pricing, packagingAs discovered

Competitive Response Spectrum

SituationResponseExample
They launch feature you haveEmphasize experience, depth"We've had this for 2 years, here's what we've learned"
They launch feature you don'tRoadmap or reframe"We're focused on X because customers told us Y matters more"
They cut priceHold on value"You get what you pay for — here's the TCO comparison"
They spread FUDCorrect with facts"That's not accurate — here's the truth with proof"
They announce fundingIgnore or pivot to stability"We've been profitable since 2019"

Intelligence Sources (Ranked by Value)

  1. Win/loss interviews — First-party, high signal
  2. Sales call recordings — Real objections, real context
  3. Customer feedback — Why they chose you (and considered others)
  4. G2/Capterra reviews — Volume of sentiment data
  5. LinkedIn activity — Hiring, messaging, customer posts
  6. Job postings — Strategic direction signals
  7. Press/funding news — Major moves, positioning shifts
  8. Product trials — Hands-on intel (respect ToS)

Anti-Patterns

  • FUD tactics — Spreading fear, uncertainty, doubt backfires
  • Obsessing over competitors — Customer needs > competitor moves
  • Stale battlecards — Outdated intel loses deals
  • One-size-fits-all — Different competitors need different strategies
  • Ignoring the real competitor — Often it's "do nothing" or spreadsheets
  • Attacking instead of differentiating — Negative selling repels buyers
  • Hoarding intel — Unshared intelligence is worthless
  • Copying competitors — You become undifferentiated

コメント