econ-macro-indicators について
econ-macro-indicatorsは、ビジネスや地域分析でマクロ経済指標を解釈するためのリファレンススキルです。指標を時間的な役割で分類し、遅行データを予測として扱わずに、傾向や乖離、影響を評価する手順を示します。
主な機能
- 01先行・一致・遅行指標の分類
- 02主要な経済指標の概要
- 03指標間の関係の説明
- 04傾向と乖離の確認手順
- 05マクロ評価テンプレート
活用シーン
- 01地域のマクロ経済状況の評価
- 02先行シグナルと遅行データの比較
- 03ビジネス判断の経済的背景の検討
インストール
コマンドをコピーしてターミナルで実行します。
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ asgard-ai-platform/ skills --skill econ-macro-indicatorsインストール後、Claude Code で/econ-macro-indicatorsを入力して読み込まれたか確認します。
同梱ファイルexamples/sample_scenario.mdreferences/taiwan-data-sources.md
README(原文)English
プロジェクトの README よりこの README の日本語訳はまだありません。以下は英語の原文です。日本語の紹介はページ上部をご覧ください。
Macroeconomic Indicators
Overview
Macroeconomic indicators measure aggregate economic performance. They divide into leading (predict future), coincident (reflect current), and lagging (confirm past) indicators. Understanding these helps contextualize business decisions within the broader economic environment.
Framework
IRON LAW: Leading, Coincident, or Lagging — Know Which Type
GDP growth is LAGGING — by the time it's published, the economy has already
changed. Stock markets and PMI are LEADING — they predict future direction.
Unemployment is LAGGING — it rises after a recession starts.
Using a lagging indicator to predict the future is looking in the rearview mirror.
Match the indicator type to your analysis purpose.
Key Indicators
GDP (Gross Domestic Product)
- Type: Lagging
- Measures: Total economic output
- Key signals: 2 consecutive quarters of negative growth = technical recession
- Taiwan: Published quarterly by DGBAS
Inflation (CPI/PPI)
- Type: Coincident
- CPI = consumer prices, PPI = producer prices (leading indicator for CPI)
- Target: Most central banks target ~2%
- Taiwan: CPI published monthly by DGBAS
Unemployment Rate
- Type: Lagging
- Natural rate varies by country (~3.5-4% for Taiwan)
- Watch U-3 (official) vs broader measures that include underemployment
Interest Rates
- Central bank policy rate (台灣央行重貼現率)
- Raising rates → slows economy, fights inflation, strengthens currency
- Lowering rates → stimulates economy, risks inflation, weakens currency
Exchange Rate
- TWD/USD, TWD/JPY, TWD/CNY for Taiwan-centric analysis
- Depreciation → exports cheaper but imports more expensive
- Watch real effective exchange rate (REER) for trade competitiveness
PMI (Purchasing Managers' Index)
- Type: Leading
- Above 50 = expansion, below 50 = contraction
- Published monthly, available before GDP data
Indicator Relationships
Central bank raises rates
→ Borrowing costs rise
→ Consumer spending slows + Business investment slows
→ GDP growth slows
→ Unemployment rises (with lag)
→ Inflation falls (the goal)
Analysis Steps
- Gather current data for 5-6 key indicators
- Classify each as leading/coincident/lagging
- Identify trends (improving, stable, deteriorating)
- Check for divergence (leading indicators pointing different direction from lagging = inflection point)
- Assess implications for the specific business/industry context
Output Format
# Macroeconomic Assessment: {Country/Region}
## Indicator Dashboard
| Indicator | Current | Previous | Trend | Type |
|-----------|---------|----------|-------|------|
| GDP Growth | X% | X% | ↑/↓/→ | Lagging |
| CPI Inflation | X% | X% | ↑/↓/→ | Coincident |
| Unemployment | X% | X% | ↑/↓/→ | Lagging |
| Policy Rate | X% | X% | ↑/↓/→ | — |
| PMI | XX | XX | ↑/↓/→ | Leading |
| Exchange Rate | X.XX | X.XX | ↑/↓/→ | — |
## Economic Phase
{Expansion / Peak / Contraction / Trough}
## Key Signals
- Leading indicators suggest: {direction}
- Divergence: {if any — e.g., PMI falling while GDP still positive = slowdown ahead}
## Business Implications
- For {industry}: {specific impact}
Examples
Correct Application
Scenario: Taiwan macro assessment Q4 2025
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| GDP Growth | 3.2% YoY | Solid but decelerating from 4.1% |
| CPI | 2.1% | Near target, stable |
| Unemployment | 3.6% | Near full employment |
| Policy Rate | 2.0% | Held steady for 3 quarters |
| PMI | 48.5 | Below 50 — leading indicator of slowdown |
Diagnosis: GDP looks healthy (lagging) but PMI signals contraction ahead. The economy is likely at or near peak phase ✓
Incorrect Application
- "GDP grew 3.2% last quarter, so the economy will grow next quarter too" → GDP is lagging. PMI at 48.5 suggests otherwise. Violates Iron Law: using lagging indicator to predict future.
Gotchas
- Headline vs core inflation: Headline CPI includes volatile food and energy. Core CPI excludes them. Central banks focus on core for policy decisions.
- Real vs nominal: Always specify. "GDP grew 5%" — nominal or real? Real GDP adjusts for inflation and shows true growth.
- Seasonal adjustment: Unemployment, retail sales, and many indicators are seasonally adjusted. Compare adjusted-to-adjusted, never adjusted-to-raw.
- Taiwan-specific: Taiwan's economy is heavily export-dependent. TSMC's revenue guidance is arguably a better leading indicator for Taiwan than generic PMI.
- Data revision: Initial GDP estimates are revised 2-3 times. Don't overreact to first releases.
References
- For business cycle theory, see the econ-business-cycle skill
- For Taiwan-specific economic data sources, see
references/taiwan-data-sources.md