mcpField
F
fix-merge-conflicts

fix-merge-conflicts

github.com/yeachan-heo其他40.7k8 次安装今天更新
代码仓库

关于 fix-merge-conflicts

用于解决合并冲突并尽量保留双方意图的技能。它指导开发者完成集成、变更分析、验证,并在无法完成时安全中止或交接。

主要功能

  1. 01先集成获准的基线
  2. 02检查双方的变更
  3. 03默认保留双方意图
  4. 04解决后运行项目检查
  5. 05安全中止或报告未完成工作

适用场景

  1. 01解决自有分支上的冲突
  2. 02分析合并或变基中的冲突变更
  3. 03验证并完成冲突解决

安装

复制下面的命令,在终端中运行。

$npx skills add https://github.com/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill fix-merge-conflicts

安装后在 Claude Code 中输入/fix-merge-conflicts确认已加载。

README 原文English

来自项目 README

README 暂无中文译文,以下为英文原文;中文介绍见上方。

Fix Merge Conflicts

A conflict is two intents meeting in one file. Resolution that flattens either intent is a bug with a clean git status.

Workflow

  1. Establish ownership: you resolve conflicts on a branch you own, against a base others own. Conflicts on a shared branch get reported to the owner, not resolved unilaterally.
  2. Start the approved integration first: fetch the remote base (git fetch origin <base>) and merge the fetched SHA — git merge FETCH_HEAD (or the project's rebase convention, when the caller has not constrained it) — so the conflicts you inspect match what GitHub reported; a local base ref can be absent or behind origin/<base>, and git merge never refreshes it implicitly. A mergeable: conflicting answer from the remote, or a clean local branch, has no MERGE_HEAD — git log --merge before integrating exits 128.
  3. Read both intents: git log --merge -p -- <file> for each conflicted file once the merge is in progress — what did each side change and why (commit messages are evidence). Conflict markers show the what; the commits show the why. On the rebase path there is no MERGE_HEAD — git log --merge reads nothing there; read the topic side with git show REBASE_HEAD -- <file> (the dotted range REBASE_HEAD..HEAD excludes the topic commit itself, so it shows only the base side) and the base side with git log -p HEAD -- <file> until the rebase continues. When the caller forbids starting an integration at all (e.g. read-only inspection), compare explicit ranges instead: git log -p <base>...HEAD -- <file>.
  4. Resolve: the default is both-intent-preserving — base side's change and branch side's change both survive, composed. When the intents are genuinely incompatible, the base (upstream) intent wins on shared surfaces and the branch adapts, and the override is reported with its reason.
  5. Validate: run the project's checks (build/test/lint at minimum) on the resolved tree. A resolution that compiles but breaks a test took the wrong side somewhere. If intent analysis, resolution, or validation cannot complete after a merge starts, run git merge --abort; after a rebase starts, run git rebase --abort. If abort is unsafe or unavailable, stop and hand off the repository with the active MERGE_HEAD/REBASE_HEAD and conflict list explicitly reported.
  6. Finalize: for a rebase, stage each resolved file and run git rebase --continue repeatedly until git status shows no active rebase. Validate that final tree before pushing. Then commit the resolution with a message naming what each side wanted. No force-push to shared branches, ever; a rebased own-branch uses --force-with-lease — unless a caller (e.g. babysit) forbids rebase and force-push entirely, in which case merge-commit resolution is the only path.

Rules

  • Never resolve by "take ours/theirs" wholesale; that is choosing a winner, not resolving.
  • Generated files (lockfiles, snapshots) regenerate rather than hand-merge.
  • The resolution commit's message states the two intents it composed — the next archaeologist (why) will need it.

评论

支持 Markdown