mcpField
K
karpathy-meta-reflection

karpathy-meta-reflection

github.com/learnprompt生产力118123 次安装16 周前更新
代码仓库

关于 karpathy-meta-reflection

karpathy-meta-reflection 是一套用于定期审视 AI 对工作影响的提示词与反思流程,面向希望校准技能和职业方向的人。它结合月度审计、每周回顾与半年角色复盘,追踪技能萎缩和 AI 带来的杠杆点。

主要功能

  1. 01月度职业影响审计
  2. 02每周 AI 使用回顾
  3. 03技能萎缩与杠杆矩阵
  4. 04半年角色变化复盘
  5. 05判断领域是否发生转变
  6. 06技能学习价值评估

适用场景

  1. 01盘点本月交给 AI 的任务
  2. 02找出需继续练习的技能
  3. 03识别 AI 提升效率的工作
  4. 04评估职业角色变化

安装

复制下面的命令,在终端中运行。

$npx skills add https://github.com/learnprompt/andrej-karpathy-skills --skill karpathy-meta-reflection

安装后在 Claude Code 中输入/karpathy-meta-reflection确认已加载。

详细介绍

技能 10:元反思(元反思)

来源:https://x.com/karpathy/status/2004607146781278521 | https://x.com/karpathy/status/2015883857489522876 “作为程序员,我从未觉得自己落后这么多”——5.6 万个赞

核心原则

形势变化的速度,超出了你的直觉更新速度。刻意反思,才能让自己的判断保持准确。

Karpathy 持续追踪三件事:

  1. 哪些技能正在萎缩(无论好坏,AI 正在接手)
  2. 什么正在爆发(你以前不具备的新杠杆)
  3. 你现在的真正工作是什么(你的角色描述是否已经在你不知不觉间发生了变化?)

月度职业审视提示词

每月进行一次,耗时 20-30 分钟:

Monthly AI Impact Audit — [MONTH YEAR]

My role/field: [YOUR JOB OR DOMAIN]

Part 1: ATROPHYING SKILLS
Things I've been having AI do in the last month:
[LIST 5-10 TASKS YOU DELEGATED TO AI]

For each, analyze:
- How much would it hurt if AI wasn't available for this?
- Is my ability to do this manually getting worse?
- Is that acceptable? (YES = commodity skill / NO = must maintain)

Part 2: EXPLODING LEVERAGE
New things I can now do (or do much faster) because of AI:
[LIST 3-5 NEW CAPABILITIES OR SPEED MULTIPLIERS]

For each: what specifically unlocked this? What should I double down on?

Part 3: ROLE REDEFINITION
Complete this: "In 2023, my job was to [X]. In [CURRENT YEAR], my job is actually to [Y]."

Part 4: NEXT MONTH FOCUS
1. One skill I will DELIBERATELY practice without AI:
2. One new AI capability I will DELIBERATELY learn:
3. One thing I will STOP doing manually because AI is better:

萎缩/杠杆矩阵

针对你拥有的任何技能,在这个 2x2 矩阵中标出它的位置:

                    HIGH LEVERAGE WITH AI
                           │
    MUST RETAIN            │      MAXIMIZE
    (ai makes it faster    │      (your competitive
     but you need the      │      edge lives here)
     judgment)             │
                           │
HIGH ──────────────────────┼────────────────────── LOW
ATROPHY                    │                      ATROPHY
                           │
    SAFELY DELEGATE        │      ABANDON/AUTOMATE
    (commodity, ai is      │      (low value, losing
     better, let it go)    │      it doesn't matter)
                           │
                    LOW LEVERAGE WITH AI

角色重新定义提示词

每 6 个月进行一次深入反思:

Help me understand how my role has evolved.

My job title/domain: [ROLE]
Experience: [YEARS]

Before AI tools (2022 and earlier), my core value was:
[WHAT YOU WERE HIRED/VALUED FOR]

Today, with current AI tools:
1. What percentage of my old tasks can AI now do at 80%+ quality?
2. What tasks have INCREASED in value because AI can't do them (judgment, relationships, taste, ethics)?
3. What new tasks exist now that didn't exist 2 years ago?
4. If I were hiring for my own role today, what would the job description say?
5. What would I tell my 2022 self about what skills to prioritize?

Be specific. Name actual tasks, not abstract concepts.

追踪阶段性转变

Karpathy 将 2025 年描述为一次“阶段性转变”——不是渐进式改进,而是进入了另一种模式。这个提示词能帮你留意自己所在领域的阶段性转变:

Diagnose if my field/work has hit a phase shift.

Domain: [YOUR FIELD]
Recent changes I've noticed: [LIST 3-5 CHANGES IN HOW WORK IS DONE]

Is this:
A) Incremental improvement (same work, faster tools)
B) Role shift (different emphasis within same field)  
C) Phase shift (fundamentally different mode of working)
D) Field transformation (new field is emerging from the old one)

Evidence for your diagnosis. And: what does this mean for where I should invest my time in the next 12 months?

每周 5 分钟检查

适用于每周节奏的轻量版本:

Quick weekly AI reflection — [DATE]

3 things AI helped me do better this week:
1.
2.
3.

1 thing I learned from reviewing AI output:

1 skill I exercised without AI:

One thing I want to pay more attention to next week:

适用于任何技能的“Karpathy 测试”

在投入时间学习某项技能之前,先问:

Should I learn [SKILL] deeply in the current AI landscape?

Evaluate:
1. Can current LLMs do this at 80%+ quality? (yes/no)
2. Is human judgment still required for the 20% that matters? (yes/no)
3. Does understanding this deeply make me better at directing AI to do it? (yes/no)
4. Is this skill a prerequisite for judgment that AI can't replicate? (yes/no)

Recommendation: LEARN_DEEPLY / LEARN_BASICS / DELEGATE / SKIP
Reasoning: [2-3 sentences]

工作流

属于工作流:月度体检(入口)

位置上游下游
入口每月定期触发 / 用户感到焦虑时karpathy-understanding-first(定位理解力盲区)

完整链路:meta-reflection → understanding-first → practice-environments → education-first

提示词约定

Run a monthly career atrophy audit. Step 1: List my completed tasks this month (I'll provide or you pull from context). Step 2: For each, mark if I delegated to AI and the atrophy risk level. Step 3: Identify my top 3 leverage points (where AI made me 10x). Step 4: Identify my top 2 atrophy risks (skills degrading). Step 5: Recommend one thing to practice next month and one thing to fully delegate. Output as a structured report.

验证清单

  • 任务清单来自实际工作(不是假设)
  • 萎缩风险有具体证据(不是泛泛焦虑)
  • 杠杆点有量化感知(「快了多少」)
  • 下月练习计划具体到可执行(不是「多学习」)
  • 下月委托计划明确到什么任务完全交给 AI
  • 报告可以月月对比追踪变化趋势

评论

支持 Markdown