mcpField
P
partner-text-coach

partner-text-coach

github.com/curiositech其他257260 次安装2 天前更新
代码仓库

关于 partner-text-coach

帮助用户理解伴侣短信的情绪含义,并拟定更清晰、体贴的回复。该技能还提供冲突降温、角色扮演和后续沟通建议,但不适用于操控关系或处理虐待情境。

主要功能

  1. 01分析短信表层与情绪
  2. 02拟定有回应性的回复
  3. 03校准语气并缓和冲突
  4. 04角色扮演预演对话
  5. 05规划短信后的沟通

适用场景

  1. 01回复伴侣发来的难处理短信
  2. 02在文字争执升级前尝试降温
  3. 03发送前预演不同回复的影响

安装

复制下面的命令,在终端中运行。

$npx skills add https://github.com/curiositech/some_claude_skills --skill partner-text-coach

安装后在 Claude Code 中输入/partner-text-coach确认已加载。

附带文件.claude-plugin/plugin.jsonreferences/attachment-styles.md

详细介绍

伴侣沟通教练

以情商应对伴侣沟通。理解对方的真实想法,撰写能增进联结的回复,并建立更健康的沟通模式。

何时使用此技能

适用于:

  • 解读伴侣消息中的情绪潜台词
  • 为棘手的短信撰写体贴的回复
  • 在短信冲突升级前缓和局势
  • 规划短信交流后的后续对话
  • 学习更健康的沟通模式
  • 了解自己的沟通风格

不适用于:

  • 操纵或“赢得”争论 → 寻求健康沟通
  • 报复、冷处理或沉默对待的建议 → 无助于解决问题
  • 替代伴侣治疗 → 短信沟通指导只是补充,不能取而代之
  • 虐待关系 → 联系家庭暴力援助资源
  • 法律事务 → 咨询相关专业人士

工作原理

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    PARTNER TEXT COACH FLOW                       │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                  │
│  1. SHARE          2. ANALYZE           3. RESPOND              │
│  ├─ Their message  ├─ Surface meaning   ├─ Response options     │
│  ├─ Context        ├─ Emotional layer   ├─ Tone calibration     │
│  └─ Your feelings  └─ Unmet needs       └─ Follow-up plan       │
│                                                                  │
│  4. TALK BACK      5. REFLECT           6. GROW                 │
│  ├─ Clarify intent ├─ What worked?      ├─ Pattern recognition  │
│  ├─ Role play      ├─ What didn't?      ├─ Skill building       │
│  └─ Alternatives   └─ Next time...      └─ Better understanding │
│                                                                  │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

消息分析框架

解读消息的三个层次
LAYER 1: SURFACE (What they said)
├── Literal words and their meaning
├── Concrete content/information
└── What they're directly asking or stating

LAYER 2: EMOTION (What they feel)
├── Tone indicators (punctuation, word choice, timing)
├── Underlying feelings (hurt, fear, frustration, love)
└── What emotional state sent this message?

LAYER 3: NEED (What they need)
├── Unmet needs driving the emotion
├── What they want from you (even if not stated)
└── What would make this better?

Example:
Message: "Fine. Do whatever you want."

Layer 1: Permission given
Layer 2: Frustration, feeling unheard, possibly hurt
Layer 3: Needs to feel considered, included in decisions, valued
短信沟通中的危险信号
SIGNS A TEXT CONVERSATION IS GOING BADLY:
├── Increasing brevity (full sentences → one word)
├── Delayed responses from normally quick responder
├── Passive aggressive punctuation ("Fine." vs "Fine!")
├── All caps or excessive punctuation
├── Topic-switching (avoiding the issue)
├── Sarcasm appearing
└── "Whatever" / "Nevermind" / "Forget it"

WHEN TO STOP TEXTING:
├── Either person is clearly upset
├── Complex topic that needs voice/face
├── Same point repeated 3+ times
├── You're composing essay-length responses
├── You're waiting anxiously for responses
└── You're screenshot-ready (venting to others)

WHAT TO SAY:
"This feels important. Can we talk about this in person/on a call
when we're both in a good space? I want to actually hear you."

以依恋理论为基础的回复

了解依恋模式
ANXIOUS ATTACHMENT (partner):
├── May send multiple texts before you respond
├── Reads into delays and brief responses
├── Needs reassurance of connection
├── Fears abandonment

→ RESPOND WITH: Reassurance, clear affection, predictable communication
→ AVOID: Long unexplained silences, vague plans, dismissive responses

AVOIDANT ATTACHMENT (partner):
├── May pull back when things get emotional
├── Needs space that doesn't mean rejection
├── Values independence
├── Fears engulfment

→ RESPOND WITH: Space without drama, respect for autonomy, patience
→ AVOID: Overwhelming with texts, demanding immediate processing

SECURE ATTACHMENT (goal):
├── Comfortable with closeness AND independence
├── Responds to emotion without reactivity
├── Clear, direct communication
├── Conflict doesn't threaten the relationship

→ AIM FOR: "I hear you, I'm here, we'll figure this out"

撰写回复

三段式回复结构
1. ACKNOWLEDGE (what they said/felt)
   "I hear that you're frustrated about yesterday."

2. OWN (your part, if any, without over-apologizing)
   "You're right that I didn't give you a heads up about my plans."

3. BRIDGE (toward resolution)
   "Can we talk tonight about how to handle this better?"

Example full response:
"I hear that you're frustrated about yesterday, and you're right—
I should have told you about my plans before just making them.
Can we talk about this tonight when I get home?
I want to do better at including you."
调整回复语气
TOO COLD                    JUST RIGHT                  TOO HOT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"K"                         "Okay, that works for me"   "OMG YESSS!!! 😍😍😍"

"Fine"                      "I understand that          "I'm SO SORRY I can't
                            might be disappointing"     believe I did that
                                                        I feel TERRIBLE"

"We'll talk later"          "This feels important—      "WE NEED TO TALK
                            can we call tonight?"       RIGHT NOW"

Match their energy + aim slightly toward warmth and clarity
缓和冲突的模板
WHEN THEY'RE UPSET:
├── "I can see this really matters to you."
├── "I don't want to fight—I want to understand."
├── "You're right that I [specific thing]. I'm sorry."
├── "I hear you. Can you help me understand more?"
└── "I love you. Let's figure this out together."

WHEN YOU'RE UPSET:
├── "I'm feeling [emotion] about [specific thing]."
├── "I need [specific need], can we talk about how to make that happen?"
├── "When [behavior], I feel [emotion]. Can we talk about this?"
├── "I'm not angry at you—I'm frustrated about the situation."
└── "I want to work on this together."

WHEN BOTH ARE UPSET:
├── "I think we're both feeling unheard right now."
├── "Let's pause and try again when we're calmer."
├── "I love you and I'm frustrated. Both are true."
├── "Can we start over? I don't want this to become a fight."
└── "We're on the same team. Let's act like it."

“对话练习”功能

如何使用“对话练习”
After sharing their message and getting suggestions:

YOU: "But what if I said it this way instead?"
COACH: [analyzes your alternative, provides feedback]

YOU: "How might they take that?"
COACH: [predicts potential interpretations based on context]

YOU: "Can we role-play their response?"
COACH: [simulates possible partner responses]

YOU: "What's the worst case if I send this?"
COACH: [explores potential negative reactions]

This is interactive—push back, try alternatives, think out loud.
角色扮演模式
You can ask:
├── "Pretend you're my partner—how would you respond to this?"
├── "If I said [X], what might they say back?"
├── "Play devil's advocate on this response"
└── "What's the most generous interpretation of their message?"

This helps you:
├── Anticipate responses before sending
├── Test different approaches
├── Build empathy for their perspective
├── Catch potential misunderstandings

非暴力沟通(NVC)参考

NVC 公式
OBSERVATION + FEELING + NEED + REQUEST

1. OBSERVATION (specific, non-judgmental)
   ❌ "You never help around here"
   ✓ "The dishes were still in the sink when I got home"

2. FEELING (your emotional experience)
   ❌ "You make me feel abandoned"
   ✓ "I feel overwhelmed when I see that"

3. NEED (universal human need underneath)
   ❌ "I need you to not be lazy"
   ✓ "I need partnership in maintaining our home"

4. REQUEST (specific, doable)
   ❌ "Be more helpful"
   ✓ "Would you be willing to handle dishes on weekdays?"

FULL EXAMPLE:
"When I came home and saw the dishes still in the sink (observation),
I felt overwhelmed (feeling) because I need partnership in keeping
our home comfortable (need). Would you be willing to handle dishes
on the weekdays you're home first? (request)"
适用于短信的 NVC 表达
Full NVC can feel formal in texts. Adaptations:

FORMAL:
"When I don't hear from you for hours, I feel anxious
because I need reassurance of our connection.
Would you be willing to send a quick text
if you're going to be unreachable?"

CASUAL VERSION:
"Hey, when I don't hear from you for a while,
I start worrying. Can you just shoot me a quick text
if you're gonna be offline?"

Keep the structure, soften the formality.

戈特曼研究:四骑士

避免伤害关系的沟通模式
THE FOUR HORSEMEN (avoid in texts AND speaking):

1. CRITICISM (attacking character)
   ❌ "You always forget. You're so thoughtless."
   ✓ "I'm bummed that you forgot. Can we set a reminder together?"

2. CONTEMPT (superiority, disrespect)
   ❌ "Oh sure, like YOU would understand."
   ✓ "I want to explain my perspective better."

3. DEFENSIVENESS (playing victim, counter-attacking)
   ❌ "That's not fair! YOU do the same thing!"
   ✓ "You're right about that. I also want to share my experience."

4. STONEWALLING (shutting down, withdrawing)
   ❌ [no response for hours/days]
   ✓ "I need some time to process. Can we talk at 7?"

Each horseman has an antidote. Use them.

后续策略

一轮棘手的短信交流之后
THE REPAIR CONVERSATION:
├── Wait until you're both calm (at least 30 min)
├── Start with "I want to understand better"
├── Lead with your part in the conflict
├── Ask questions, don't make accusations
├── End with what you appreciate about them

REPAIR STARTERS:
├── "I didn't like how that conversation went."
├── "I think we were both triggered. Can we try again?"
├── "I'm sorry for [specific thing]. I could have done better."
├── "I want to hear more about what was going on for you."
└── "What do you need from me right now?"
确认对方的联结请求
After important texts, check if your bid was received:

BID: An attempt to connect (question, joke, request, share)

"I shared something important and didn't get much response.
That felt [lonely/dismissed/confusing].
I'd love to know your thoughts when you have space for it."

This is not accusatory—it's clear communication about needs.

反模式

“赢得”争论

模式:把短信交流当成一场必须赢下的较量。 问题:伴侣不是对手。“赢”意味着有人输。 建议:寻求理解和解决方案,而不是胜利。

过度解释

模式:发长篇大论为自己的立场辩护。 问题:让伴侣不堪重负,显得防备心很强,还容易招来一篇反驳。 建议:简明扼要。“我们能不能当面再聊聊?”

把治疗术语当武器

模式:“你在回避”/“那是在煤气灯操纵” 问题:把概念当作攻击手段,会让对话陷入僵局。 建议:描述这件事对你的影响,而不是给对方贴诊断标签。

截图文化

模式:把短信发给朋友,寻求认同。 问题:把第三方卷进来,收集对伴侣不利的证据。 建议:私下梳理,或和治疗师谈谈,不要发到群聊里。

臆测语气

模式:从含糊的短信中读出负面意图。 问题:你往往会猜错。短信缺少语气和背景信息。 建议:询问以澄清。“我不太确定——你在生气吗?”

重要界限

THIS SKILL WILL NOT:
├── Help you manipulate your partner
├── Craft deceptive messages
├── Advise on how to "win"
├── Provide scripts for ending relationships via text
├── Replace couples therapy
└── Help in abusive dynamics (seek professional help)

THIS SKILL WILL:
├── Help you communicate more clearly
├── Understand your partner's perspective
├── De-escalate conflict
├── Express your needs constructively
├── Build healthier patterns
└── Know when to move to voice/in-person

集成方向

  • sober-addict-protector:康复过程中的关系沟通
  • modern-drug-rehab-computer:家庭关系指导
  • jungian-psychologist:更深层的人际关系模式

核心理念:目标不是写出完美的短信,而是建立一种沟通安全、清晰且能增进联结的关系。每条短信都是一个选择点——拉近彼此,或推开彼此。这项技能能帮助你做出明智的选择。

评论

支持 Markdown