关于 solidity-security
为智能合约开发者和审计人员提供 Solidity 安全指导,讲解常见漏洞防护、安全编码模式、Gas 优化,以及专业审计准备。
主要功能
- 01重入与访问控制防护
- 02整数安全与输入验证
- 03抢先交易缓解方法
- 04Gas 优化模式
- 05安全测试与审计清单
适用场景
- 01检查合约中的常见漏洞
- 02为 DeFi 合约采用更安全的模式
- 03准备审计所需的合约文档与检查
安装
复制下面的命令,在终端中运行。
$
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ ormus-solutions/ libreuiux-claude-code --skill solidity-security安装后在 Claude Code 中输入/solidity-security确认已加载。
详细介绍
Solidity 安全
掌握智能合约安全最佳实践、漏洞防范和安全的 Solidity 开发模式。
何时使用此技能
- 编写安全的智能合约
- 审计现有合约中的漏洞
- 实现安全的 DeFi 协议
- 防范重入、溢出和访问控制问题
- 在保证安全的同时优化 Gas 用量
- 为合约接受专业审计做好准备
- 了解常见攻击途径
严重漏洞
1. 重入
攻击者会在状态更新前回调你的合约。
存在漏洞的代码:
// VULNERABLE TO REENTRANCY
contract VulnerableBank {
mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
function withdraw() public {
uint256 amount = balances[msg.sender];
// DANGER: External call before state update
(bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}("");
require(success);
balances[msg.sender] = 0; // Too late!
}
}
安全模式(检查-效果-交互):
contract SecureBank {
mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
function withdraw() public {
uint256 amount = balances[msg.sender];
require(amount > 0, "Insufficient balance");
// EFFECTS: Update state BEFORE external call
balances[msg.sender] = 0;
// INTERACTIONS: External call last
(bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}("");
require(success, "Transfer failed");
}
}
替代方案:ReentrancyGuard
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/ReentrancyGuard.sol";
contract SecureBank is ReentrancyGuard {
mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
function withdraw() public nonReentrant {
uint256 amount = balances[msg.sender];
require(amount > 0, "Insufficient balance");
balances[msg.sender] = 0;
(bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}("");
require(success, "Transfer failed");
}
}
2. 整数溢出/下溢
存在漏洞的代码(Solidity < 0.8.0):
// VULNERABLE
contract VulnerableToken {
mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public {
// No overflow check - can wrap around
balances[msg.sender] -= amount; // Can underflow!
balances[to] += amount; // Can overflow!
}
}
安全模式(Solidity >= 0.8.0):
// Solidity 0.8+ has built-in overflow/underflow checks
contract SecureToken {
mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public {
// Automatically reverts on overflow/underflow
balances[msg.sender] -= amount;
balances[to] += amount;
}
}
对于 Solidity < 0.8.0,请使用 SafeMath:
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol";
contract SecureToken {
using SafeMath for uint256;
mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public {
balances[msg.sender] = balances[msg.sender].sub(amount);
balances[to] = balances[to].add(amount);
}
}
3. 访问控制
存在漏洞的代码:
// VULNERABLE: Anyone can call critical functions
contract VulnerableContract {
address public owner;
function withdraw(uint256 amount) public {
// No access control!
payable(msg.sender).transfer(amount);
}
}
安全模式:
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol";
contract SecureContract is Ownable {
function withdraw(uint256 amount) public onlyOwner {
payable(owner()).transfer(amount);
}
}
// Or implement custom role-based access
contract RoleBasedContract {
mapping(address => bool) public admins;
modifier onlyAdmin() {
require(admins[msg.sender], "Not an admin");
_;
}
function criticalFunction() public onlyAdmin {
// Protected function
}
}
4. 抢先交易
存在漏洞:
// VULNERABLE TO FRONT-RUNNING
contract VulnerableDEX {
function swap(uint256 amount, uint256 minOutput) public {
// Attacker sees this in mempool and front-runs
uint256 output = calculateOutput(amount);
require(output >= minOutput, "Slippage too high");
// Perform swap
}
}
缓解措施:
contract SecureDEX {
mapping(bytes32 => bool) public usedCommitments;
// Step 1: Commit to trade
function commitTrade(bytes32 commitment) public {
usedCommitments[commitment] = true;
}
// Step 2: Reveal trade (next block)
function revealTrade(
uint256 amount,
uint256 minOutput,
bytes32 secret
) public {
bytes32 commitment = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(
msg.sender, amount, minOutput, secret
));
require(usedCommitments[commitment], "Invalid commitment");
// Perform swap
}
}
安全最佳实践
检查-效果-交互模式
contract SecurePattern {
mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
function withdraw(uint256 amount) public {
// 1. CHECKS: Validate conditions
require(amount <= balances[msg.sender], "Insufficient balance");
require(amount > 0, "Amount must be positive");
// 2. EFFECTS: Update state
balances[msg.sender] -= amount;
// 3. INTERACTIONS: External calls last
(bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}("");
require(success, "Transfer failed");
}
}
拉取优于推送模式
// Prefer this (pull)
contract SecurePayment {
mapping(address => uint256) public pendingWithdrawals;
function recordPayment(address recipient, uint256 amount) internal {
pendingWithdrawals[recipient] += amount;
}
function withdraw() public {
uint256 amount = pendingWithdrawals[msg.sender];
require(amount > 0, "Nothing to withdraw");
pendingWithdrawals[msg.sender] = 0;
payable(msg.sender).transfer(amount);
}
}
// Over this (push)
contract RiskyPayment {
function distributePayments(address[] memory recipients, uint256[] memory amounts) public {
for (uint i = 0; i < recipients.length; i++) {
// If any transfer fails, entire batch fails
payable(recipients[i]).transfer(amounts[i]);
}
}
}
输入验证
contract SecureContract {
function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public {
// Validate inputs
require(to != address(0), "Invalid recipient");
require(to != address(this), "Cannot send to contract");
require(amount > 0, "Amount must be positive");
require(amount <= balances[msg.sender], "Insufficient balance");
// Proceed with transfer
balances[msg.sender] -= amount;
balances[to] += amount;
}
}
紧急停止(断路器)
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/Pausable.sol";
contract EmergencyStop is Pausable, Ownable {
function criticalFunction() public whenNotPaused {
// Function logic
}
function emergencyStop() public onlyOwner {
_pause();
}
function resume() public onlyOwner {
_unpause();
}
}
Gas 优化
使用 uint256,而不是更小的类型
// More gas efficient
contract GasEfficient {
uint256 public value; // Optimal
function set(uint256 _value) public {
value = _value;
}
}
// Less efficient
contract GasInefficient {
uint8 public value; // Still uses 256-bit slot
function set(uint8 _value) public {
value = _value; // Extra gas for type conversion
}
}
打包存储变量
// Gas efficient (3 variables in 1 slot)
contract PackedStorage {
uint128 public a; // Slot 0
uint64 public b; // Slot 0
uint64 public c; // Slot 0
uint256 public d; // Slot 1
}
// Gas inefficient (each variable in separate slot)
contract UnpackedStorage {
uint256 public a; // Slot 0
uint256 public b; // Slot 1
uint256 public c; // Slot 2
uint256 public d; // Slot 3
}
函数参数使用 calldata,而不是 memory
contract GasOptimized {
// More gas efficient
function processData(uint256[] calldata data) public pure returns (uint256) {
return data[0];
}
// Less efficient
function processDataMemory(uint256[] memory data) public pure returns (uint256) {
return data[0];
}
}
使用事件存储数据(适用时)
contract EventStorage {
// Emitting events is cheaper than storage
event DataStored(address indexed user, uint256 indexed id, bytes data);
function storeData(uint256 id, bytes calldata data) public {
emit DataStored(msg.sender, id, data);
// Don't store in contract storage unless needed
}
}
常见漏洞检查清单
// Security Checklist Contract
contract SecurityChecklist {
/**
* [ ] Reentrancy protection (ReentrancyGuard or CEI pattern)
* [ ] Integer overflow/underflow (Solidity 0.8+ or SafeMath)
* [ ] Access control (Ownable, roles, modifiers)
* [ ] Input validation (require statements)
* [ ] Front-running mitigation (commit-reveal if applicable)
* [ ] Gas optimization (packed storage, calldata)
* [ ] Emergency stop mechanism (Pausable)
* [ ] Pull over push pattern for payments
* [ ] No delegatecall to untrusted contracts
* [ ] No tx.origin for authentication (use msg.sender)
* [ ] Proper event emission
* [ ] External calls at end of function
* [ ] Check return values of external calls
* [ ] No hardcoded addresses
* [ ] Upgrade mechanism (if proxy pattern)
*/
}
安全测试
// Hardhat test example
const { expect } = require("chai");
const { ethers } = require("hardhat");
describe("Security Tests", function () {
it("Should prevent reentrancy attack", async function () {
const [attacker] = await ethers.getSigners();
const VictimBank = await ethers.getContractFactory("SecureBank");
const bank = await VictimBank.deploy();
const Attacker = await ethers.getContractFactory("ReentrancyAttacker");
const attackerContract = await Attacker.deploy(bank.address);
// Deposit funds
await bank.deposit({value: ethers.utils.parseEther("10")});
// Attempt reentrancy attack
await expect(
attackerContract.attack({value: ethers.utils.parseEther("1")})
).to.be.revertedWith("ReentrancyGuard: reentrant call");
});
it("Should prevent integer overflow", async function () {
const Token = await ethers.getContractFactory("SecureToken");
const token = await Token.deploy();
// Attempt overflow
await expect(
token.transfer(attacker.address, ethers.constants.MaxUint256)
).to.be.reverted;
});
it("Should enforce access control", async function () {
const [owner, attacker] = await ethers.getSigners();
const Contract = await ethers.getContractFactory("SecureContract");
const contract = await Contract.deploy();
// Attempt unauthorized withdrawal
await expect(
contract.connect(attacker).withdraw(100)
).to.be.revertedWith("Ownable: caller is not the owner");
});
});
审计准备
contract WellDocumentedContract {
/**
* @title Well Documented Contract
* @dev Example of proper documentation for audits
* @notice This contract handles user deposits and withdrawals
*/
/// @notice Mapping of user balances
mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
/**
* @dev Deposits ETH into the contract
* @notice Anyone can deposit funds
*/
function deposit() public payable {
require(msg.value > 0, "Must send ETH");
balances[msg.sender] += msg.value;
}
/**
* @dev Withdraws user's balance
* @notice Follows CEI pattern to prevent reentrancy
* @param amount Amount to withdraw in wei
*/
function withdraw(uint256 amount) public {
// CHECKS
require(amount <= balances[msg.sender], "Insufficient balance");
// EFFECTS
balances[msg.sender] -= amount;
// INTERACTIONS
(bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}("");
require(success, "Transfer failed");
}
}
资源
- references/reentrancy.md:全面介绍重入防范
- references/access-control.md:基于角色的访问模式
- references/overflow-underflow.md:SafeMath 和整数安全
- references/gas-optimization.md:Gas 节省技巧
- references/vulnerability-patterns.md:常见漏洞目录
- assets/solidity-contracts-templates.sol:安全合约模板
- assets/security-checklist.md:审计前检查清单
- scripts/analyze-contract.sh:静态分析工具
安全分析工具
- Slither:静态分析工具
- Mythril:安全分析工具
- Echidna:模糊测试工具
- Manticore:符号执行工具
- Securify:自动化安全扫描器
常见误区
- 使用
tx.origin进行身份验证:改用msg.sender - 未检查的外部调用:始终检查返回值
- 对不受信任的合约使用 Delegatecall:可能劫持你的合约
- 浮动 Pragma:固定到特定的 Solidity 版本
- 缺少事件:状态变更时发出事件
- 循环中的 Gas 消耗过多:可能达到区块 Gas 上限
- 没有升级路径:如需升级,可考虑代理模式
评论
支持 Markdown