mcpField
C
competitor-teardown

competitor-teardown

github.com/101-skills营销与增长1656.9k 次安装12 周前更新
代码仓库

关于 competitor-teardown

面向团队的结构化竞品研究技能,涵盖产品、定价、定位、发展情况、评价、内容与团队,并整合研究命令、截图流程和报告模板。

主要功能

  1. 01七层竞品分析框架
  2. 02研究命令与网页截图
  3. 03功能和定价对比表
  4. 04SWOT 与定位图模板
  5. 05用户评价分析框架
  6. 06概要及详细报告格式

适用场景

  1. 01对比竞品功能与定价
  2. 02从用户评价中分析常见问题
  3. 03编写竞争格局报告
  4. 04绘制竞品市场定位图

安装

复制下面的命令,在终端中运行。

$npx skills add https://github.com/101-skills/superpowers --skill competitor-teardown

安装后在 Claude Code 中输入/competitor-teardown确认已加载。

详细介绍

安装 belt CLI skill: npx skills add belt-sh/cli

竞品拆解

通过 inference.sh CLI 进行结构化竞品分析、调研和截图。

快速开始

需要 inference.sh CLI(belt)。安装说明

belt login

# Research competitor landscape
belt app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
  "query": "top project management tools comparison 2024 market share"
}'

# Screenshot competitor's website
belt app run infsh/agent-browser --input '{
  "url": "https://competitor.com",
  "action": "screenshot"
}'

拆解框架

7 层分析
层级分析内容数据来源
1. 产品功能、用户体验、质量截图、免费试用
2. 定价方案、定价模式、隐藏成本定价页面、销售电话
3. 定位宣传信息、标语、理想客户画像(ICP)网站、广告
4. 发展势头用户、收入、增长网络搜索、媒体报道、融资
5. 评价用户眼中的优势与劣势G2、Capterra、App Store
6. 内容博客、社交媒体、SEO 策略网站、社交媒体主页
7. 团队规模、关键招聘、背景LinkedIn、关于页面

调研命令

公司概览
# General intelligence
belt app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
  "query": "CompetitorX company overview funding team size 2024"
}'

# Funding and financials
belt app run exa/search --input '{
  "query": "CompetitorX funding round series valuation investors"
}'

# Recent news
belt app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
  "query": "CompetitorX latest news announcements 2024"
}'
产品分析
# Feature comparison
belt app run exa/search --input '{
  "query": "CompetitorX vs alternatives feature comparison review"
}'

# Pricing details
belt app run tavily/extract --input '{
  "urls": ["https://competitor.com/pricing"]
}'

# User reviews
belt app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
  "query": "CompetitorX reviews G2 Capterra pros cons 2024"
}'
用户体验截图
# Homepage
belt app run infsh/agent-browser --input '{
  "url": "https://competitor.com",
  "action": "screenshot"
}'

# Pricing page
belt app run infsh/agent-browser --input '{
  "url": "https://competitor.com/pricing",
  "action": "screenshot"
}'

# Signup flow
belt app run infsh/agent-browser --input '{
  "url": "https://competitor.com/signup",
  "action": "screenshot"
}'

功能矩阵

结构
| Feature | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|---------|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Real-time collaboration | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| API access | ✅ | Paid only | ✅ | ❌ |
| SSO/SAML | ✅ | Enterprise | ✅ | Enterprise |
| Custom reports | ✅ | Limited | ✅ | ❌ |
| Mobile app | ✅ | iOS only | ✅ | ✅ |
| Free tier | ✅ (unlimited) | ✅ (3 users) | ❌ | ✅ (1 project) |
| Integrations | 50+ | 100+ | 30+ | 20+ |
规则
  • ✅ = 完全支持
  • ⚠️ 或“部分” = 支持有限或有条件
  • ❌ = 不支持
  • 注明条件:“仅限付费版”“企业版”“Beta 版”
  • 突出你胜出的功能
  • 如实呈现竞品的优势——可信度很重要

定价对比

结构
| | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|---------|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| **Free tier** | Yes, 5 users | Yes, 3 users | No |
| **Starter** | $10/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $12/user/mo |
| **Pro** | $25/user/mo | $30/user/mo | $29/user/mo |
| **Enterprise** | Custom | Custom | $50/user/mo |
| **Billing** | Monthly/Annual | Annual only | Monthly/Annual |
| **Annual discount** | 20% | 15% | 25% |
| **Min seats** | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| **Hidden costs** | None | Setup fee $500 | API calls metered |
需要关注的事项
  • 最低席位要求
  • 仅支持按年付费(灵活性较低)
  • 不同等级间的功能限制
  • 超额费用
  • 设置/入门指导费用
  • 合同锁定期限

SWOT 分析

为每个竞品创建 SWOT 分析:

### Competitor A — SWOT

| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|-----------|------------|
| • Strong brand recognition | • Slow feature development |
| • Large integration ecosystem | • Complex onboarding (30+ min) |
| • Enterprise sales team | • No free tier |

| Opportunities | Threats |
|--------------|---------|
| • AI features not yet shipped | • New AI-native competitors |
| • Expanding into mid-market | • Customer complaints about pricing |
| • International markets untapped | • Key engineer departures (LinkedIn) |

定位图

一个 2x2 矩阵,展示竞品在两个有意义的维度上的位置。

选择有意义的坐标轴
好的坐标轴不好的坐标轴
简单 ↔ 复杂好 ↔ 坏
中小企业 ↔ 企业便宜 ↔ 昂贵(过于显而易见)
自助服务 ↔ 销售主导旧 ↔ 新
专业化 ↔ 通用型小 ↔ 大
主见鲜明 ↔ 灵活—
模板
                    Enterprise
                        │
           Competitor C │  Competitor A
                ●       │       ●
                        │
  Simple ──────────────────────────── Complex
                        │
            You ●       │  Competitor B
                        │       ●
                        │
                      SMB
生成可视化图表
# Create positioning map with Python
belt app run infsh/python-executor --input '{
  "code": "import matplotlib.pyplot as plt\nimport matplotlib\nmatplotlib.use(\"Agg\")\n\nfig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 10))\n\n# Competitors\ncompetitors = {\n    \"You\": (-0.3, -0.3),\n    \"Competitor A\": (0.5, 0.6),\n    \"Competitor B\": (0.6, -0.4),\n    \"Competitor C\": (-0.4, 0.5)\n}\n\nfor name, (x, y) in competitors.items():\n    color = \"#22c55e\" if name == \"You\" else \"#6366f1\"\n    size = 200 if name == \"You\" else 150\n    ax.scatter(x, y, s=size, c=color, zorder=5)\n    ax.annotate(name, (x, y), textcoords=\"offset points\", xytext=(10, 10), fontsize=12, fontweight=\"bold\")\n\nax.axhline(y=0, color=\"grey\", linewidth=0.5)\nax.axvline(x=0, color=\"grey\", linewidth=0.5)\nax.set_xlim(-1, 1)\nax.set_ylim(-1, 1)\nax.set_xlabel(\"Simple ← → Complex\", fontsize=14)\nax.set_ylabel(\"SMB ← → Enterprise\", fontsize=14)\nax.set_title(\"Competitive Positioning Map\", fontsize=16, fontweight=\"bold\")\nax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)\nplt.tight_layout()\nplt.savefig(\"positioning-map.png\", dpi=150)\nprint(\"Saved\")"
}'

评价挖掘

评价来源
平台最适合URL 格式
G2B2B SaaSg2.com/products/[product]/reviews
Capterra商业软件capterra.com/software/[id]/reviews
App StoreiOS 应用apps.apple.com
Google PlayAndroid 应用play.google.com
Product Hunt产品发布producthunt.com/posts/[product]
Reddit真实看法reddit.com/r/[relevant-sub]
提取内容
类别关注点
最受好评满意的用户最常提到哪些功能?
最多抱怨不满意的用户怎么说?(= 你的机会)
切换原因用户为什么离开?哪些因素会触发切换?
功能请求用户想要但目前缺少什么?
对比评价用户进行对比时,会怎么说?
# Mine G2 reviews
belt app run tavily/search-assistant --input '{
  "query": "CompetitorX G2 reviews complaints issues 2024"
}'

# Reddit sentiment
belt app run exa/search --input '{
  "query": "reddit CompetitorX alternative frustration switching"
}'

交付成果格式

执行摘要(1 页)
## Competitive Landscape Summary

**Market:** [Category] — $[X]B market growing [Y]% annually

**Key competitors:** A (leader), B (challenger), C (niche)

**Our positioning:** [Where you sit and why it matters]

**Key insight:** [One sentence about the biggest opportunity]

| Metric | You | A | B | C |
|--------|-----|---|---|---|
| Users | X | Y | Z | W |
| Pricing (starter) | $X | $Y | $Z | $W |
| Rating (G2) | X.X | Y.Y | Z.Z | W.W |
详细报告(每个竞品一份)
  1. 公司概览(规模、融资、团队)
  2. 产品分析(功能、用户体验截图)
  3. 定价明细
  4. SWOT 分析
  5. 评价分析(好评最多、抱怨最多)
  6. 与你的定位对比
  7. 机会总结

对比网格可视化图

# Stitch competitor screenshots into comparison
belt app run infsh/stitch-images --input '{
  "images": ["your-homepage.png", "competitorA-homepage.png", "competitorB-homepage.png"],
  "direction": "horizontal"
}'

常见错误

错误问题修正方法
只关注功能忽略定位、定价和市场表现使用 7 层框架
分析有偏见失去可信度如实说明竞争对手的优势
数据过时得出错误结论标注所有研究的日期,每季度更新
竞争对手过多导致分析瘫痪聚焦于排名前 3-5 的直接竞争对手
没有说明“所以呢”有数据却没有洞见在每个部分的结尾说明对你的启示
只比较功能无法展现定位纳入定价、评价和定位图

相关技能

npx skills add inference-sh/skills@web-search
npx skills add inference-sh/skills@prompt-engineering

浏览所有应用:belt app list

评论

支持 Markdown