mcpField
D
debug-with-file

debug-with-file

github.com/catlog22开发2.1k79 次安装19 周前更新
代码仓库

关于 debug-with-file

debug-with-file 是通过记录证据和迭代假设来调查复杂问题的调试 Skill。它将发现写入文件,并依据日志修正判断、记录修复与验证过程。

主要功能

  1. 01生成可测试的假设
  2. 02记录 NDJSON 调试证据
  3. 03在 understanding.md 中记录调查过程
  4. 04跟踪假设结论与历史
  5. 05修复验证及清理调试插桩

适用场景

  1. 01分多轮调查复杂问题
  2. 02为团队记录证据与推理过程
  3. 03保存可能复发问题的根因发现

安装

复制下面的命令,在终端中运行。

$npx skills add https://github.com/catlog22/claude-code-workflow --skill debug-with-file

安装后在 Claude Code 中输入/debug-with-file确认已加载。

详细介绍

Codex 文件辅助调试提示词

概述

增强基于证据的调试,并记录探索过程。记录理解的演变、整合洞见,并利用分析纠正误解。

核心工作流:探索 → 记录 → 记录日志 → 分析 → 修正理解 → 修复 → 验证

相较于 /prompts:debug 的主要增强:

  • understanding.md:记录探索和学习过程的时间线
  • 分析辅助修正:验证并修正假设
  • 整合:简化已证实错误的理解,避免内容冗杂
  • 保留经验:保留已学到的内容,即使来自失败的尝试

目标 Bug

$BUG

项目上下文

运行 ccw spec load --category debug,了解已知问题、解决方法和根因说明。

执行流程

Session Detection:
   ├─ Check if debug session exists for this bug
   ├─ EXISTS + understanding.md exists → Continue mode
   └─ NOT_FOUND → Explore mode

Explore Mode:
   ├─ Locate error source in codebase
   ├─ Document initial understanding in understanding.md
   ├─ Generate testable hypotheses with analysis validation
   ├─ Add NDJSON logging instrumentation
   └─ Output: Hypothesis list + await user reproduction

Analyze Mode:
   ├─ Parse debug.log, validate each hypothesis
   ├─ Use analysis to evaluate hypotheses and correct understanding
   ├─ Update understanding.md with:
   │   ├─ New evidence
   │   ├─ Corrected misunderstandings (strikethrough + correction)
   │   └─ Consolidated current understanding
   └─ Decision:
       ├─ Confirmed → Fix root cause
       ├─ Inconclusive → Add more logging, iterate
       └─ All rejected → Assisted new hypotheses

Fix & Cleanup:
   ├─ Apply fix based on confirmed hypothesis
   ├─ User verifies
   ├─ Document final understanding + lessons learned
   ├─ Remove debug instrumentation
   └─ If not fixed → Return to Analyze mode

实现细节

会话设置与模式检测
步骤 0:确定项目根目录

检测项目根目录,确保 .workflow/ 产物位置正确:

PROJECT_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)

优先通过 git 获取仓库根目录;非 git 项目回退到 pwd 取当前绝对路径。 存储为 {projectRoot},后续所有 .workflow/ 路径必须以此为前缀。

const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
const projectRoot = bash('git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd').trim()

const bugSlug = "$BUG".toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, '-').substring(0, 30)
const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10)

const sessionId = `DBG-${dateStr}-${bugSlug}`
const sessionFolder = `${projectRoot}/.workflow/.debug/${sessionId}`
const debugLogPath = `${sessionFolder}/debug.log`
const understandingPath = `${sessionFolder}/understanding.md`
const hypothesesPath = `${sessionFolder}/hypotheses.json`

// Auto-detect mode
const sessionExists = fs.existsSync(sessionFolder)
const hasUnderstanding = sessionExists && fs.existsSync(understandingPath)
const logHasContent = sessionExists && fs.existsSync(debugLogPath) && fs.statSync(debugLogPath).size > 0

const mode = logHasContent ? 'analyze' : (hasUnderstanding ? 'continue' : 'explore')

if (!sessionExists) {
  bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}`)
}
探索模式
步骤 1.1:定位错误来源
// Extract keywords from bug description
const keywords = extractErrorKeywords("$BUG")

// Search codebase for error locations
const searchResults = []
for (const keyword of keywords) {
  const results = Grep({ pattern: keyword, path: ".", output_mode: "content", "-C": 3 })
  searchResults.push({ keyword, results })
}

// Identify affected files and functions
const affectedLocations = analyzeSearchResults(searchResults)
步骤 1.2:记录初步理解

创建 understanding.md:

# Understanding Document

**Session ID**: ${sessionId}
**Bug Description**: $BUG
**Started**: ${getUtc8ISOString()}

---

## Exploration Timeline

### Iteration 1 - Initial Exploration (${timestamp})

#### Current Understanding

Based on bug description and initial code search:

- Error pattern: ${errorPattern}
- Affected areas: ${affectedLocations.map(l => l.file).join(', ')}
- Initial hypothesis: ${initialThoughts}

#### Evidence from Code Search

${searchResults.map(r => `
**Keyword: "${r.keyword}"**
- Found in: ${r.results.files.join(', ')}
- Key findings: ${r.insights}
`).join('\n')}

#### Next Steps

- Generate testable hypotheses
- Add instrumentation
- Await reproduction

---

## Current Consolidated Understanding

${initialConsolidatedUnderstanding}
步骤 1.3:生成假设

分析 Bug 并生成 3-5 个可测试的假设:

// Hypothesis generation based on error pattern
const HYPOTHESIS_PATTERNS = {
  "not found|missing|undefined|未找到": "data_mismatch",
  "0|empty|zero|registered": "logic_error",
  "timeout|connection|sync": "integration_issue",
  "type|format|parse": "type_mismatch"
}

function generateHypotheses(bugDescription, affectedLocations) {
  // Generate targeted hypotheses based on error analysis
  // Each hypothesis includes:
  // - id: H1, H2, ...
  // - description: What might be wrong
  // - testable_condition: What to log
  // - logging_point: Where to add instrumentation
  // - evidence_criteria: What confirms/rejects it
  return hypotheses
}

保存到 hypotheses.json:

{
  "iteration": 1,
  "timestamp": "2025-01-21T10:00:00+08:00",
  "hypotheses": [
    {
      "id": "H1",
      "description": "Data structure mismatch - expected key not present",
      "testable_condition": "Check if target key exists in dict",
      "logging_point": "file.py:func:42",
      "evidence_criteria": {
        "confirm": "data shows missing key",
        "reject": "key exists with valid value"
      },
      "likelihood": 1,
      "status": "pending"
    }
  ]
}
步骤 1.4:添加 NDJSON 插桩

为每个假设,在指定位置添加日志记录:

Python 模板:

# region debug [H{n}]
try:
    import json, time
    _dbg = {
        "sid": "{sessionId}",
        "hid": "H{n}",
        "loc": "{file}:{line}",
        "msg": "{testable_condition}",
        "data": {
            # Capture relevant values here
        },
        "ts": int(time.time() * 1000)
    }
    with open(r"{debugLogPath}", "a", encoding="utf-8") as _f:
        _f.write(json.dumps(_dbg, ensure_ascii=False) + "\n")
except: pass
# endregion

JavaScript/TypeScript 模板:

// region debug [H{n}]
try {
  require('fs').appendFileSync("{debugLogPath}", JSON.stringify({
    sid: "{sessionId}",
    hid: "H{n}",
    loc: "{file}:{line}",
    msg: "{testable_condition}",
    data: { /* Capture relevant values */ },
    ts: Date.now()
  }) + "\n");
} catch(_) {}
// endregion
步骤 1.5:向用户输出
## Hypotheses Generated

Based on error "$BUG", generated {n} hypotheses:

{hypotheses.map(h => `
### ${h.id}: ${h.description}
- Logging at: ${h.logging_point}
- Testing: ${h.testable_condition}
- Evidence to confirm: ${h.evidence_criteria.confirm}
- Evidence to reject: ${h.evidence_criteria.reject}
`).join('')}

**Debug log**: ${debugLogPath}

**Next**: Run reproduction steps, then come back for analysis.
分析模式
步骤 2.1:解析调试日志
// Parse NDJSON log
const entries = Read(debugLogPath).split('\n')
  .filter(l => l.trim())
  .map(l => JSON.parse(l))

// Group by hypothesis
const byHypothesis = groupBy(entries, 'hid')

// Validate each hypothesis
for (const [hid, logs] of Object.entries(byHypothesis)) {
  const hypothesis = hypotheses.find(h => h.id === hid)
  const latestLog = logs[logs.length - 1]

  // Check if evidence confirms or rejects hypothesis
  const verdict = evaluateEvidence(hypothesis, latestLog.data)
  // Returns: 'confirmed' | 'rejected' | 'inconclusive'
}
步骤 2.2:分析证据并修正理解

检查调试日志并评估每个假设:

  1. 解析所有日志条目
  2. 按假设 ID 分组
  3. 将证据与预期标准进行比较
  4. 判定结论:已确认 | 已否定 | 无定论
  5. 找出先前理解中的错误假设
  6. 生成修正内容
步骤 2.3:根据修正更新理解

在 understanding.md 中追加新一轮记录:

### Iteration ${n} - Evidence Analysis (${timestamp})

#### Log Analysis Results

${results.map(r => `
**${r.id}**: ${r.verdict.toUpperCase()}
- Evidence: ${JSON.stringify(r.evidence)}
- Reasoning: ${r.reason}
`).join('\n')}

#### Corrected Understanding

Previous misunderstandings identified and corrected:

${corrections.map(c => `
- ~~${c.wrong}~~ → ${c.corrected}
  - Why wrong: ${c.reason}
  - Evidence: ${c.evidence}
`).join('\n')}

#### New Insights

${newInsights.join('\n- ')}

${confirmedHypothesis ? `
#### Root Cause Identified

**${confirmedHypothesis.id}**: ${confirmedHypothesis.description}

Evidence supporting this conclusion:
${confirmedHypothesis.supportingEvidence}
` : `
#### Next Steps

${nextSteps}
`}

---

## Current Consolidated Understanding (Updated)

${consolidatedUnderstanding}
步骤 2.4:更新 hypotheses.json
{
  "iteration": 2,
  "timestamp": "2025-01-21T10:15:00+08:00",
  "hypotheses": [
    {
      "id": "H1",
      "status": "rejected",
      "verdict_reason": "Evidence shows key exists with valid value",
      "evidence": {...}
    },
    {
      "id": "H2",
      "status": "confirmed",
      "verdict_reason": "Log data confirms timing issue",
      "evidence": {...}
    }
  ],
  "corrections": [
    {
      "wrong_assumption": "...",
      "corrected_to": "...",
      "reason": "..."
    }
  ]
}
修复与验证
步骤 3.1:应用修复

根据已确认的假设,在受影响的文件中实施修复。

步骤 3.2:记录解决方案

在 understanding.md 中追加:

### Iteration ${n} - Resolution (${timestamp})

#### Fix Applied

- Modified files: ${modifiedFiles.join(', ')}
- Fix description: ${fixDescription}
- Root cause addressed: ${rootCause}

#### Verification Results

${verificationResults}

#### Lessons Learned

What we learned from this debugging session:

1. ${lesson1}
2. ${lesson2}
3. ${lesson3}

#### Key Insights for Future

- ${insight1}
- ${insight2}
步骤 3.3:清理

搜索区域标记并移除调试插桩:

const instrumentedFiles = Grep({
  pattern: "# region debug|// region debug",
  output_mode: "files_with_matches"
})

for (const file of instrumentedFiles) {
  // Remove content between region markers
  removeDebugRegions(file)
}

会话文件夹结构

{projectRoot}/.workflow/.debug/DBG-{date}-{slug}/
├── debug.log           # NDJSON log (execution evidence)
├── understanding.md    # Exploration timeline + consolidated understanding
└── hypotheses.json     # Hypothesis history with verdicts

理解文档模板

# Understanding Document

**Session ID**: DBG-xxx-2025-01-21
**Bug Description**: [original description]
**Started**: 2025-01-21T10:00:00+08:00

---

## Exploration Timeline

### Iteration 1 - Initial Exploration (2025-01-21 10:00)

#### Current Understanding
...

#### Evidence from Code Search
...

#### Hypotheses Generated
...

### Iteration 2 - Evidence Analysis (2025-01-21 10:15)

#### Log Analysis Results
...

#### Corrected Understanding
- ~~[wrong]~~ → [corrected]

#### Analysis Results
...

---

## Current Consolidated Understanding

### What We Know
- [valid understanding points]

### What Was Disproven
- ~~[disproven assumptions]~~

### Current Investigation Focus
[current focus]

### Remaining Questions
- [open questions]

调试日志格式(NDJSON)

每行都是一个 JSON 对象:

{"sid":"DBG-xxx-2025-01-21","hid":"H1","loc":"file.py:func:42","msg":"Check dict keys","data":{"keys":["a","b"],"target":"c","found":false},"ts":1734567890123}
字段描述
sid会话 ID
hid假设 ID(H1、H2……)
loc代码位置
msg正在测试的内容
data捕获的值
ts时间戳(毫秒)

迭代流程

First Call (BUG="error"):
   ├─ No session exists → Explore mode
   ├─ Extract error keywords, search codebase
   ├─ Document initial understanding in understanding.md
   ├─ Generate hypotheses
   ├─ Add logging instrumentation
   └─ Await user reproduction

After Reproduction (BUG="error"):
   ├─ Session exists + debug.log has content → Analyze mode
   ├─ Parse log, evaluate hypotheses
   ├─ Update understanding.md with:
   │   ├─ Evidence analysis results
   │   ├─ Corrected misunderstandings (strikethrough)
   │   ├─ New insights
   │   └─ Updated consolidated understanding
   ├─ Update hypotheses.json with verdicts
   └─ Decision:
       ├─ Confirmed → Fix → Document resolution
       ├─ Inconclusive → Add logging, document next steps
       └─ All rejected → Assisted new hypotheses

Output:
   ├─ {projectRoot}/.workflow/.debug/DBG-{date}-{slug}/debug.log
   ├─ {projectRoot}/.workflow/.debug/DBG-{date}-{slug}/understanding.md (evolving document)
   └─ {projectRoot}/.workflow/.debug/DBG-{date}-{slug}/hypotheses.json (history)

错误处理

情况操作
debug.log 为空确认复现过程是否触发了该代码路径
所有假设都被否定根据已被证伪的假设生成新假设
修复无效记录失败的修复尝试,并基于修正后的理解继续迭代
迭代次数 >5检查整合后的理解,并附上完整上下文升级处理
理解内容过长大幅整合,将较早的迭代记录存档到单独的文件

整合规则

更新“当前整合后的理解”时:

  1. 简化已证伪的内容:移至“已证伪的内容”,并用一句话概括
  2. 保留有效洞见:将已确认的发现移至“已知内容”
  3. 避免重复:不要在整合部分重复时间线详情
  4. 聚焦当前状态:关注我们现在知道什么,而不是经历了什么
  5. 保留关键修正:保留重要的错误→正确转变,以供学习

反面示例(内容杂乱):

## Current Consolidated Understanding

In iteration 1 we thought X, but in iteration 2 we found Y, then in iteration 3...
Also we checked A and found B, and then we checked C...

正面示例(已整合):

## Current Consolidated Understanding

### What We Know
- Error occurs during runtime update, not initialization
- Config value is None (not missing key)

### What Was Disproven
- ~~Initialization error~~ (Timing evidence)
- ~~Missing key hypothesis~~ (Key exists)

### Current Investigation Focus
Why is config value None during update?

主要功能

功能说明
NDJSON 日志记录带有假设追踪的结构化调试日志
假设生成借助分析创建假设
探索文档带时间线的 understanding.md
理解演进时间线 + 修正追踪
错误修正对错误假设使用删除线并说明原因
汇总学习成果当前理解部分
假设历史带结论的 hypotheses.json
分析验证在关键决策点进行

适用场景

最适合用于:

  • 需要多轮调查的复杂 Bug
  • 从调试过程中学习很有价值
  • 团队需要了解调试的理由
  • Bug 可能再次出现,文档有助于预防

现在执行针对 Bug 的 debug-with-file 工作流:$BUG

评论

支持 Markdown