delegated-development

子 Agent 驱动的开发

通过为每个任务分派全新的子 Agent 来执行计划，并在每个任务后进行两阶段审查：先进行规范符合性审查，再进行代码质量审查。

核心原则： 每个任务使用全新的子 Agent + 两阶段审查（先规范后质量）= 高质量、快速迭代

何时使用

digraph when_to_use {
    "Have implementation plan?" [shape=diamond];
    "Tasks mostly independent?" [shape=diamond];
    "Stay in this session?" [shape=diamond];
    "subagent-driven-development" [shape=box];
    "executing-plans" [shape=box];
    "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [shape=box];

    "Have implementation plan?" -> "Tasks mostly independent?" [label="yes"];
    "Have implementation plan?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no"];
    "Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Stay in this session?" [label="yes"];
    "Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no - tightly coupled"];
    "Stay in this session?" -> "subagent-driven-development" [label="yes"];
    "Stay in this session?" -> "executing-plans" [label="no - parallel session"];
}

对比执行计划（并行会话）：

• 同一会话（无上下文切换）
• 每个任务使用全新的子 Agent（无上下文污染）
• 每个任务后进行两阶段审查：先规范符合性，再代码质量
• 更快的迭代（任务之间无需人工介入）

流程

digraph process {
    rankdir=TB;

    subgraph cluster_per_task {
        label="Per Task";
        "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
        "Implementer subagent asks questions?" [shape=diamond];
        "Answer questions, provide context" [shape=box];
        "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [shape=box];
        "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
        "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" [shape=diamond];
        "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [shape=box];
        "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
        "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" [shape=diamond];
        "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [shape=box];
        "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [shape=box];
    }

    "Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" [shape=box];
    "More tasks remain?" [shape=diamond];
    "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [shape=box];
    "Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];

    "Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)";
    "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" -> "Implementer subagent asks questions?";
    "Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Answer questions, provide context" [label="yes"];
    "Answer questions, provide context" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)";
    "Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [label="no"];
    "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)";
    "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?";
    "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [label="no"];
    "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"];
    "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
    "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?";
    "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [label="no"];
    "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"];
    "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [label="yes"];
    "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" -> "More tasks remain?";
    "More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
    "More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [label="no"];
    "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" -> "Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch";
}

提示词模板

• ./implementer-prompt.md - 分派实现者子 Agent
• ./spec-reviewer-prompt.md - 分派规范符合性审查者子 Agent
• ./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md - 分派代码质量审查者子 Agent

工作流示例

You: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.

[Read plan file once: docs/plans/feature-plan.md]
[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]
[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]

Task 1: Hook installation script

[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]
[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]

Implementer: "Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?"

You: "User level (~/.config/superpowers/hooks/)"

Implementer: "Got it. Implementing now..."
[Later] Implementer:
  - Implemented install-hook command
  - Added tests, 5/5 passing
  - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it
  - Committed

[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]
Spec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra

[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]
Code reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.

[Mark Task 1 complete]

Task 2: Recovery modes

[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]
[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]

Implementer: [No questions, proceeds]
Implementer:
  - Added verify/repair modes
  - 8/8 tests passing
  - Self-review: All good
  - Committed

[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]
Spec reviewer: ❌ Issues:
  - Missing: Progress reporting (spec says "report every 100 items")
  - Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)

[Implementer fixes issues]
Implementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting

[Spec reviewer reviews again]
Spec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now

[Dispatch code quality reviewer]
Code reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)

[Implementer fixes]
Implementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant

[Code reviewer reviews again]
Code reviewer: ✅ Approved

[Mark Task 2 complete]

...

[After all tasks]
[Dispatch final code-reviewer]
Final reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge

Done!

优势

对比手动执行：

• 子 Agent 自然遵循 TDD
• 每个任务使用全新上下文（无混淆）
• 并行安全（子 Agent 之间互不干扰）
• 子 Agent 可以提问（在工作开始前及进行中）

对比执行计划：

• 同一会话（无需交接）
• 持续推进（无需等待）
• 审查检查点自动化

效率提升：

• 无文件读取开销（控制器提供完整文本）
• 控制器精确挑选所需的上下文
• 子 Agent 提前获得完整信息
• 问题在工作开始前暴露（而非之后）

质量关卡：

• 自审在交接前发现问题
• 两阶段审查：规范符合性，然后代码质量
• 审查循环确保修复真正有效
• 规范符合性防止过度/不足构建
• 代码质量确保实现构建良好

成本：

• 更多子 Agent 调用（每个任务：实现者 + 2 位审查者）
• 控制器需要更多准备工作（提前提取所有任务）
• 审查循环增加迭代次数
• 但能及早发现问题（比之后调试更便宜）

危险信号

绝不：

• 跳过审查（规范符合性或代码质量）
• 带着未修复的问题继续
• 并行分派多个实现子 Agent（冲突）
• 让子 Agent 读取计划文件（改为提供完整文本）
• 跳过场景设定上下文（子 Agent 需要理解任务所处的位置）
• 忽略子 Agent 的问题（在让其继续之前回答）
• 在规范符合性上接受“差不多就行”（规范审查者发现问题 = 未完成）
• 跳过审查循环（审查者发现问题 = 实现者修复 = 再次审查）
• 让实现者的自审替代实际审查（两者都需要）
• 在规范符合性为 ✅ 之前开始代码质量审查（顺序错误）
• 在任一审查存在未解决问题时进入下一个任务

如果子 Agent 提问：

• 清晰且完整地回答
• 如有需要，提供额外上下文
• 不要催促其进入实现

如果审查者发现问题：

• 实现者（同一子 Agent）修复它们
• 审查者再次审查
• 重复直到通过
• 不要跳过重新审查

如果子 Agent 任务失败：

• 分派修复子 Agent 并提供具体指令
• 不要尝试手动修复（上下文污染）

集成

必需的工作流技能：

• superpowers:writing-plans - 创建此技能所执行的计划
• superpowers:requesting-code-review - 供审查者子 Agent 使用的代码审查模板
• superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch - 在所有任务完成后完成开发

子 Agent 应使用：

• superpowers:test-driven-development - 子 Agent 为每个任务遵循 TDD

替代工作流：

• superpowers:executing-plans - 用于并行会话而非同会话执行