关于 Lead Qualification
Lead Qualification 是依据既定标准评估并评分销售线索的技能,可帮助销售团队确定跟进优先级、识别风险并规划后续行动;评分依赖用户提供的标准和信息。
主要功能
- 01使用 BANT、MEDDIC 和 GPCTBA/C&I
- 02评估线索匹配度与互动度
- 03识别风险信号与积极信号
- 04建议后续行动
- 05生成线索评估报告
- 06支持定期重新评估
适用场景
- 01确定销售外联的线索优先级
- 02评估线索的预算与决策流程
- 03比较不同线索的互动情况
- 04记录评估结果以便后续跟进
安装
复制下面的命令,在终端中运行。
$
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ claude-office-skills/ skills --skill lead-qualification安装后在 Claude Code 中输入/lead-qualification确认已加载。
详细介绍
潜在客户资格评估
根据既定标准为潜在客户评分并评估资格,以有效集中销售精力。
概述
此技能可帮助你:
- 根据资格评估标准评估潜在客户
- 为潜在客户评分,以确定优先级
- 识别阻碍成交的因素和有利信号
- 推荐后续行动
- 保持资格评估的一致性
资格评估框架
BANT(预算、决策权、需求、时间安排)
## BANT Qualification: [Lead Name]
### Budget (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Defined budget? | [Yes/No/Unknown] | /10 |
| Budget range? | [$X - $Y] | /10 |
| Budget fits our pricing? | [Yes/No] | /5 |
**Budget Score**: [X]/25
### Authority (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Decision maker? | [Yes/No/Influencer] | /10 |
| Who else involved? | [Names/Roles] | /5 |
| Sign-off process? | [Description] | /5 |
| Champion identified? | [Yes/No] | /5 |
**Authority Score**: [X]/25
### Need (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Clear pain point? | [Description] | /10 |
| Impact of not solving? | [Description] | /10 |
| Using alternatives? | [Current solution] | /5 |
**Need Score**: [X]/25
### Timeline (/25)
| Question | Answer | Score |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Target implementation? | [Date/Quarter] | /10 |
| Urgency level? | [High/Medium/Low] | /10 |
| Trigger event? | [Description] | /5 |
**Timeline Score**: [X]/25
---
**Total BANT Score**: [X]/100
**Qualification**: [Qualified / Needs Work / Not Qualified]
MEDDIC(指标、经济决策者、决策标准、决策流程、识别痛点、支持者)
## MEDDIC Qualification: [Lead Name]
### Metrics
**Business impact they expect**:
- [Metric 1]: [Current] → [Target]
- [Metric 2]: [Current] → [Target]
### Economic Buyer
**Person with budget authority**:
- Name: [Name]
- Title: [Title]
- Access: [Direct/Indirect/None]
### Decision Criteria
**How they'll evaluate solutions**:
1. [Criterion 1] - Weight: [%]
2. [Criterion 2] - Weight: [%]
3. [Criterion 3] - Weight: [%]
### Decision Process
**Steps to purchase**:
1. [Step 1] - Owner: [Name] - Timeline: [Date]
2. [Step 2] - Owner: [Name] - Timeline: [Date]
3. [Step 3] - Owner: [Name] - Timeline: [Date]
### Identify Pain
**Core problem**:
[Description of the pain point]
**Implications of not solving**:
[Business impact]
### Champion
**Internal advocate**:
- Name: [Name]
- Influence level: [High/Medium/Low]
- What they gain: [Personal win]
---
**MEDDIC Coverage**: [X]/6 elements confirmed
**Deal Health**: [Strong / At Risk / Weak]
GPCTBA/C&I(目标、计划、挑战、时间安排、预算、决策权、后果与影响)
## GPCTBA/C&I: [Lead Name]
### Goals
What are they trying to achieve?
- [Goal 1]
- [Goal 2]
### Plans
How do they plan to achieve it?
- [Current plan]
### Challenges
What's stopping them?
- [Challenge 1]
- [Challenge 2]
### Timeline
When do they need to achieve this?
- Target: [Date]
- Urgency: [High/Medium/Low]
### Budget
What resources are allocated?
- Amount: [Range]
- Approved: [Yes/No/Pending]
### Authority
Who makes the decision?
- Decision Maker: [Name]
- Influencers: [Names]
- Process: [Description]
### Consequences (Negative)
What happens if they don't solve this?
- [Consequence 1]
- [Consequence 2]
### Implications (Positive)
What happens when they succeed?
- [Benefit 1]
- [Benefit 2]
潜在客户评分模型
匹配度评分(人口统计特征)
## Fit Scoring Criteria
### Company Fit (50 points)
| Criterion | Points | Lead Value | Score |
|-----------|--------|------------|-------|
| Industry | /15 | [Industry] | |
| Company Size | /15 | [Employees] | |
| Revenue | /10 | [Revenue] | |
| Geography | /10 | [Location] | |
**Company Fit**: [X]/50
### Contact Fit (50 points)
| Criterion | Points | Lead Value | Score |
|-----------|--------|------------|-------|
| Title/Role | /20 | [Title] | |
| Department | /15 | [Dept] | |
| Seniority | /15 | [Level] | |
**Contact Fit**: [X]/50
**Total Fit Score**: [X]/100
参与度评分(行为特征)
## Engagement Scoring
### Website Activity
| Action | Points | Occurrences | Score |
|--------|--------|-------------|-------|
| Pricing page view | 10 | [X] | |
| Demo request | 25 | [X] | |
| Content download | 5 | [X] | |
| Blog visit | 2 | [X] | |
### Email Engagement
| Action | Points | Occurrences | Score |
|--------|--------|-------------|-------|
| Email opened | 1 | [X] | |
| Link clicked | 3 | [X] | |
| Replied | 10 | [X] | |
### Event Participation
| Action | Points | Occurrences | Score |
|--------|--------|-------------|-------|
| Webinar attended | 15 | [X] | |
| Meeting booked | 25 | [X] | |
**Total Engagement Score**: [X]/100
输出格式
潜在客户资格评估报告
# Lead Qualification: [Company/Contact]
## Summary
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| **Fit Score** | [X]/100 |
| **Engagement Score** | [X]/100 |
| **BANT Score** | [X]/100 |
| **Overall** | [X]/100 |
## Qualification Status
🟢 **QUALIFIED** / 🟡 **NEEDS NURTURING** / 🔴 **NOT QUALIFIED**
## Key Findings
### ✅ Green Flags
1. [Positive indicator]
2. [Positive indicator]
### ⚠️ Yellow Flags
1. [Concern that needs addressing]
2. [Missing information]
### ❌ Red Flags
1. [Deal-breaker or major concern]
## Gaps to Address
| Gap | Question to Ask | Priority |
|-----|-----------------|----------|
| [Unknown area] | [Specific question] | High |
| [Unknown area] | [Specific question] | Medium |
## Recommended Next Steps
1. [Immediate action]
2. [Follow-up action]
3. [Long-term action]
## Disqualification Criteria Check
- [ ] Below minimum company size
- [ ] Outside target geography
- [ ] No budget authority
- [ ] Timeline > 12 months
- [ ] Already using competitor with lock-in
最佳实践
资格评估技巧
- 提出开放式问题:了解背景,而不只是得到是或否的回答
- 核实,而非假设:直接确认信息
- 记录所有信息:及时更新 CRM
- 定期重新评估资格:情况会发生变化
- 知道何时放弃:时间很宝贵
常见错误
- 过快评估资格
- 忽视危险信号
- 未识别所有利益相关者
- 认为有预算就有购买能力
- 忘记随时间推移重新评估资格
限制
- 无法直接访问 CRM 数据
- 评分需要用户提供明确的标准
- 无法核实所提供的信息
- 资格评估仅供参考,并非保证
- 人的判断仍然至关重要
评论
支持 Markdown