关于 sandler-system
sandler-system 是一项运用 David Sandler 顾问式销售方法的销售技能,面向销售人员。它通过提问和相互约定,帮助组织需求探索、评估机会并处理异议。
主要功能
- 01组织需求探索问题
- 02创建预先约定模板
- 03引导痛点挖掘
- 04提供预算评估建议
- 05构建异议应对框架
适用场景
- 01准备需求探索对话
- 02应对销售阻力
- 03评估潜在客户预算
- 04商定决策步骤
安装
复制下面的命令,在终端中运行。
$
npx skills add https:/ / github.com/ guia-matthieu/ clawfu-skills --skill sandler-system安装后在 Claude Code 中输入/sandler-system确认已加载。
详细介绍
Sandler 销售系统
运用 Sandler 的顾问式销售方法,专注于发掘痛点、预先约定和双方承诺,改变销售对话。
何时使用此技能
- 探询式对话
- 应对销售阻力
- 预算资格审查
- 建立双方承诺
- 处理异议
方法论基础
基于 David Sandler 的销售系统,其核心包括:
- 发掘痛点(而非推销功能)
- 预先约定(双方达成共识)
- 预算资格审查(尽早讨论费用)
- 决策框架(明确后续步骤)
- 平等的商业地位(不卑躬屈膝地推销)
Claude 的职责与你的决策
| Claude 的职责 | 你的决策 |
|---|---|
| 组织探询问题 | 何时使用技巧 |
| 创建预先约定模板 | 采取多强势的方式 |
| 设计痛点递进提问 | 平衡关系 |
| 提出预算资格审查建议 | 针对具体交易做判断 |
| 提供异议处理框架 | 决定是否放弃 |
说明
步骤 1:了解 Sandler 潜水艇模型
七个阶段:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ THE SANDLER SUBMARINE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 1. Bonding & Rapport ──► 2. Upfront Contract │
│ │ │ │
│ └────────────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ 3. Pain ◄──┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ 4. Budget │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ 5. Decision │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ 6. Fulfillment (Present Solution) │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ 7. Post-Sell (Reinforce Decision) │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
步骤 2:掌握痛点发掘
痛点漏斗技巧:
| 层级 | 问题类型 | 示例 |
|---|---|---|
| 表层 | 开放式 | “请详细说说。” |
| 深入 | 澄清式 | “能说得具体一些吗?” |
| 影响 | 业务层面 | “这对业务有什么影响?” |
| 个人 | 个人层面 | “这对你个人有什么影响?” |
| 承诺 | 行动 | “你尝试过哪些方法来解决?” |
步骤 3:制定预先约定
预先约定的要素:
- 时间 - 我们有多少时间?
- 议程 - 我们会讨论什么?
- 结果 - 可能会有什么结果?
- 许可 - 我们能否坦诚交流?
步骤 4:评估预算
关于费用的问题(逐步深入):
| 时机 | 问题 |
|---|---|
| 早期 | “这件事有预算吗?” |
| 中期 | “你考虑的预算范围是多少?” |
| 直接询问 | “如果我们能解决这个问题,它对你值多少钱?” |
| 测试 | “我们的解决方案通常售价为 $X。这个价格合适吗?” |
步骤 5:明确决策流程
决策问题:
- “这类决策通常是如何做出的?”
- “还需要哪些人参与?”
- “有什么因素可能导致此事无法推进?”
- “预计何时做出决定?”
示例
示例 1:使用 Sandler 框架进行探询式通话
输入:
Structure a discovery call using Sandler principles.
Context: First meeting with VP of Marketing, inbound lead.
输出:
## Sandler Discovery Call Structure
### Pre-Call Preparation
**Mindset:**
- You're interviewing them as much as they're interviewing you
- No need to convince—focus on uncovering fit
- Comfortable walking away if not right
- Equal business stature, not supplicant
---
### 1. Bonding & Rapport (5 minutes)
**Goal:** Establish equal footing, build trust
**Opening:**
"Thanks for making time, [Name]. Before we dive in, I have to admit—
I did some homework on [Company] and have some questions, but I'm
also curious about what prompted you to reach out in the first place."
**Techniques:**
- Match their energy and pace
- Find common ground (naturally)
- Demonstrate you've done research
- Be genuinely curious, not performative
---
### 2. Upfront Contract (3 minutes)
**Goal:** Mutual agreement on meeting structure
**Script:**
"[Name], to make sure we both get value from this conversation,
can I suggest how this might go?
We have about 30 minutes. I'd like to understand what's going on
in your world that made you want to talk. I'll share a bit about
what we do—but honestly, I'm not sure if we're the right fit yet.
At the end, one of three things will happen:
1. We both see enough potential to keep talking
2. You decide it's not right—and that's totally fine
3. I tell you we're not the right fit—and I promise I will
Does that work for you? And can we agree to be straight with
each other?"
**Why this works:**
- Sets expectation you might say no
- Gets permission for honest conversation
- Reduces buyer's defense mechanisms
- Establishes equal stature
---
### 3. Pain Discovery (15 minutes)
**Goal:** Uncover real pain, not surface problems
**Opening Question:**
"So, tell me—what's happening that made you want to have this
conversation now?"
**Pain Funnel in Action:**
| Their Response | Your Follow-Up |
|----------------|----------------|
| "We need better marketing automation" | "Tell me more about that" |
| "Our campaigns aren't performing" | "What does 'not performing' mean specifically?" |
| "Our open rates dropped 30%" | "How is that affecting the business?" |
| "We're missing revenue targets" | "By how much?" |
| "$2M behind this quarter" | "How does that affect you personally?" |
| "I'm on the hot seat with the CEO" | "What have you tried to fix this?" |
**Key Questions:**
1. "Tell me more about that"
2. "What do you mean by [vague term]?"
3. "How long has this been going on?"
4. "What's it costing the business?"
5. "How is this affecting you personally?"
6. "What have you tried already?"
7. "Why didn't that work?"
8. "What happens if you don't solve this?"
**Reverse Technique (when they ask about your solution early):**
> Them: "Can you just tell me how your platform works?"
> You: "I could, but honestly, I'm not sure if it's even relevant yet.
> Help me understand what you're actually trying to solve first."
---
### 4. Budget Qualification (5 minutes)
**Goal:** Understand if money is available and in what range
**Progressive Approach:**
**Level 1 (Soft):**
"If we could solve [pain you uncovered], would there be budget
for something like this?"
**Level 2 (Range):**
"When you've invested in solutions like this before, what kind
of investment was typical?"
**Level 3 (Direct):**
"I want to be respectful of your time. Solutions like ours
typically range from $X to $Y depending on scope. Does that
match what you were thinking, or are we in different universes?"
**If they resist:**
> "Look, I get it—budget conversations can be uncomfortable.
> But here's my concern: if I spend our time showing you
> something you can't afford, I've wasted both our time.
> What would be helpful here?"
---
### 5. Decision Process (3-5 minutes)
**Goal:** Map the buying process
**Questions:**
- "Walk me through how decisions like this typically get made at [Company]"
- "Who else would need to weigh in?"
- "Is there anyone who could stop this from happening?"
- "Have you bought anything like this before? How did that go?"
- "What's driving your timeline?"
**Red Flag Questions:**
- "What could make you decide NOT to move forward?"
- "What would make you go with a competitor instead of us?"
---
### 6. Upfront Contract for Next Step
**Goal:** Clear mutual commitment or clear no
**If positive indicators:**
"Based on what you've shared, I think there might be something
here. Here's what I'd suggest for next steps:
I'll put together [specific thing] that addresses [their pain].
We'd meet again with [whoever they mentioned], and at the end of
that meeting, you'll be in a position to tell me yes, no, or
'we need more information.'
Does that work? And can you commit to giving me a decision at
that meeting?"
**If unclear fit:**
"I appreciate your honesty. Based on what you've shared, I'm
not sure we're the best fit, and here's why: [reason].
What I'd suggest is [alternative or referral]. Does that help?"
---
### Sandler-isms to Remember
| Situation | Sandler Response |
|-----------|------------------|
| They want a proposal too fast | "I could send something over, but I'd just be guessing. Can we slow down?" |
| They won't discuss budget | "If we can't talk about money, how will we know if this makes sense?" |
| They ask for discount | "What is it about the value that you're questioning?" |
| They go silent after proposal | "Sounds like something's changed. Should I assume this is a no?" |
| They say "let me think about it" | "When people say that, it usually means no. Is that what's happening here?" |
示例 2:应对“让我考虑一下”
输入:
Prospect says "let me think about it" after a demo.
How do I respond using Sandler?
输出:
## Sandler Response: "Let Me Think About It"
### The Principle
In Sandler, "let me think about it" is often a polite no. Rather
than chase, you surface what's really going on.
---
### Response Script
**Option 1: Direct Reversal**
> "I appreciate that. When people tell me they need to think about
> it, usually it means something's not quite right. Can you help me
> understand—is this a no, or is there something specific you're
> trying to figure out?"
**Option 2: Permission to Be Honest**
> "[Name], I want to be straight with you. In my experience, 'let
> me think about it' often means 'no, but I don't want to say it.'
> I'd rather know now. Is this something you're genuinely considering,
> or are we done here?"
**Option 3: Negative Reverse**
> "Honestly, that sounds like a no. And that's okay—I'd rather
> know now than chase you for weeks. What's the real hesitation?"
---
### What Usually Happens
**Scenario 1: They admit it's a no**
- Thank them for honesty
- Ask what was missing
- Ask for referral or future timing
- Move on without burning bridge
**Scenario 2: They share real objection**
- Now you can actually address it
- Likely price, authority, timing, or feature gap
- Engage with real problem, not phantom
**Scenario 3: They commit to timeline**
- Great—make it an upfront contract
- "OK, so you need to think about [X]. Let's set a call for
Thursday. At that point, you'll give me a yes or no. Fair?"
---
### What NOT to Do (Traditional Sales)
| Don't | Why It Fails |
|-------|--------------|
| "When can I follow up?" | Endless chase begins |
| "What questions do you have?" | They already said they're done |
| "Let me send more info" | They didn't ask for more info |
| "I'll check back next week" | You become a pest |
---
### The Sandler Mindset
You're not desperate for this deal. If it's not right, you'd
rather know now. This confidence paradoxically makes them more
likely to engage honestly—and often reveals they were just
testing to see if you'd chase.
技能边界
此技能擅长的方面
- 组织顾问式对话
- 创建探询框架
- 以不带防御性的方式处理异议
- 诚实地评估商机
此技能无法做到的事
- 取代真正的好奇心
- 在缺乏人际关系技巧时发挥作用
- 弥补产品与市场契合度不佳
- 保证成交
迭代指南
后续提示词:
- “为 [行业] 创建痛点漏斗问题”
- “我该如何处理 [具体异议]?”
- “为 [场景] 设计预先约定”
- “如果对方不愿讨论预算,该怎么办?”
参考资料
- David Sandler - Sandler 销售系统
- 《You Can't Teach a Kid to Ride a Bike at a Seminar》
- Sandler Rules - 49 条永恒的销售原则
- Sandler Training Institute
相关技能
never-split-difference- 谈判策略spin-selling- 基于提问的销售challenger-sale- 基于启发的销售
技能元数据
- 领域:销售
- 复杂度:中级至高级
- 模式:centaur
- 见效时间:在下一次对话中应用
- 先决条件:顾问式销售情境
评论
支持 Markdown